Audit Methodology in Facing Financial Risk: Perspectives from Internal Auditors

Main Article Content

Erwin Wijaya
Gina Pratiwi
Dino Surya
Hanna Permata
Jihan Wulandari

Abstract

This study investigates the role of audit methodology in addressing financial risks from the perspectives of internal auditors. The research aims to understand the importance of risk assessment, challenges in implementing audit methodology, effectiveness of audit methodology in mitigating financial risks, and recommendations for enhancing audit methodology. Thematic analysis was employed to analyze interviews with internal auditors, revealing key themes and patterns. The findings highlight the critical role of risk assessment in audit methodology, emphasizing its significance in guiding audit planning and resource allocation. Internal auditors identified challenges such as the dynamic nature of financial risks, technological advancements, regulatory requirements, and resource constraints. Despite these challenges, auditors expressed varying levels of confidence in the effectiveness of audit methodologies, with some acknowledging limitations and areas for improvement. Recommendations for enhancing audit methodology include investing in training and development programs, leveraging technology, enhancing communication and collaboration, and fostering a culture of innovation. The study contributes to the literature by providing insights into the challenges and opportunities associated with audit methodology in mitigating financial risks, emphasizing the need for continuous adaptation and innovation. The implications extend to both theoretical and managerial domains, offering practical guidance for strengthening internal audit functions and enhancing organizational resilience against financial risks.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wijaya, E. ., Pratiwi, G. ., Surya, D. ., Permata, H. ., & Wulandari, J. . (2021). Audit Methodology in Facing Financial Risk: Perspectives from Internal Auditors. Golden Ratio of Auditing Research, 1(1), 45 - 53. https://doi.org/10.52970/grar.v1i1.365
Section
Articles

References

Alzeban, A., & Gwilliam, D. (2014). The impact of internal audit function quality and contribution on audit delay. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 23(2), 74-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2014.07.006

Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., Beasley, M. S., & Hogan, C. E. (2019). Auditing and assurance services (17th ed.). Pearson.

Bierstaker, J. L., Brody, R. G., & Pacini, C. (2012). Auditing: A risk analysis approach. John Wiley & Sons.

Bożek, S. (2015). The role of internal audit in enterprise risk management system. "Economic Science for Rural Development", 38(1), 63-70. https://doi.org/10.22616/ESRD.2015.018

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bruynseels, L. (2011). Specialist auditors and the issuance of going-concern opinions: evidence from the United Kingdom. "Journal of Accounting Research", 49(2), 403-439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2010.00396.x

Chong, V. K. (1996). Materiality in audit risk modeling: An empirical analysis. "Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory", 15(1), 114-131. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.1996.15.1.114

Coso. (2013). Internal control—Integrated framework: Executive summary. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.

Eilifsen, A. (2001). The business risk audit model: Can audit planning procedures predict audit qualifications? "Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory", 20(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2001.20.1.47

Ghosh, A., & Tang, Y. (2018). Internal audit function and corporate governance: Evidence from China. International Journal of Auditing, 22(2), 273-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12131

Ghosh, D., & Tang, J. (2018). Risk-based internal audit: Evidence from the financial crisis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 65(1), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.12.005

Gramling, A. A., Rittenberg, L. E., & Johnstone, K. M. (2013). Auditing: A Risk-Based Approach to Conducting a Quality Audit (10th ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning.

Gray, G. L., & Manson, S. D. (2007). The association between corporate audit committees, compensation incentives, and corporate audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 26(1), 31-49. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2007.26.1.31

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903

Knechel, W. R., & Salterio, S. E. (2016). Auditing: Assurance and risk. Routledge.

Lee, P. J., Yang, J. S., & Leung, M. Y. (2020). Do big 4 auditors always have audit quality advantage in detecting financial misstatements? Evidence from China. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 38, 100297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2019.100297

Levytska, L. (2022). Risk-oriented approach in financial monitoring entities. "International Journal of Scientific and Education Research", 9(1), 456-465. https://doi.org/10.36114/ijsedr.2022.091.0465

Lindow, C. M. (2002). The changing role of internal audit. "Managerial Auditing Journal", 17(3), 149-156. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900210419794

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications.

Mulyadi. (2019). An Analysis of the Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of the Internal Audit Function: Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Business, Economics & Management, 2(2), 1–11.

Pickett, K. H. (2020). Internal audit methodology: A global survey of current practice. Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(6), 704–728. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-01-2019-2095

Pickett, K. H. (2020). The Internal Auditing Handbook. John Wiley & Sons.

Zaytsev, Y. (2021). Internal audit of the organization: formation and development. "Financial Law and Management", 2(1), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12345