Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of tax audits, tax collections, and monitoring of taxpayer compliance on increasing tax revenues. The data collection method used a questionnaire. The sampling technique was based on the non-probability sampling method with a purposive sampling technique on 56 respondents at the Pratama Tax Service Office in KPP Makassar Utara who were in the Audit section including tax examiners, billing sections, and supervision and consulting sections 2, 3, and 4. Research This research uses quantitative analysis using multiple regression methods and is tested by data quality test, classic assumption test, and hypothesis test using IBM SPSS statistics version 22. The results showed that partially and simultaneously tax audits, tax collection, and monitoring of taxpayer compliance proved to have a significant positive effect on increasing tax revenues.

Keywords

Tax Audit Tax Collection Monitoring of Taxpayer Compliance Tax Receipts

Article Details

How to Cite
Kamaruddin, K., Faisal, A., & Agustam, M. R. (2022). The Effect of Tax Audit, Tax Collection, and Taxpayer Compliance Supervision on Increasing Tax Revenue at KPP Pratama Makassar Utara. Golden Ratio of Taxation Studies, 2(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.52970/grts.v2i1.245

References

  1. Beck, P. J., & Jung, W.-O. (1989). Taxpayer compliance under uncertainty. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 8(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4254(89)90009-4
  2. Casagrande, A., Cagno, D. Di, Pandimiglio, A., & Spallone, M. (2015). The effect of competition on tax compliance: The role of audit rules and shame. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 59, 96–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2015.08.006
  3. Chan, C. W., Troutman, C. S., & O’Bryan, D. (2000). An expanded model of taxpayer compliance: empirical evidence from the United States and Hong Kong. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 9(2), 83–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1061-9518(00)00027-6
  4. De Geest, G., Dari-Mattiacci, G., & Siegers, J. J. (2009). Annullable bonuses and penalties. International Review of Law and Economics, 29(4), 349–359. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2009.03.006
  5. Kubick, T. R., Lockhart, G. B., Mills, L. F., & Robinson, J. R. (2017). IRS and corporate taxpayer effects of geographic proximity. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 63(2), 428–453. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2016.09.005
  6. Lee, N., & Swenson, C. (2016). Effects of overseas subsidiaries on worldwide corporate taxes. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxa tion, 26, 47–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2016.02.001
  7. Lisi, G. (2015). Tax morale, tax compliance and the optimal tax policy. Economic Analysis and Policy, 45, 27–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2014.12.004
  8. Mascagni, G., Santoro, F., Mukama, D., Karangwa, J., & Hakizimana, N. (2022). Active Ghosts: Nil-filing in Rwanda. World Development, 152, 105806. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105806
  9. Mawani, A., & Trivedi, V. U. (2021). Collusive vs. coercively corrupt tax auditors and their impact on tax compliance. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 30, 100470. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100470
  10. Mittone, L., Panebianco, F., & Santoro, A. (2017). The bomb-crater effect of tax audits: Beyond the misperception of chance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 61, 225–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2017.04.007
  11. Organ, P. R., Ruda, A., Slemrod, J., & Turk, A. (2022). Incentive effects of the IRS’ passport certification and revocation process. Journal of Public Economics, 208, 104625. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104625
  12. Sanchez Villalba, M. (2015). Global inspection games. Journal of Public Economics, 128, 59–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.04.009