Main Article Content

Abstract

This study investigates the determinants of tax avoidance in conventional commercial banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during 2016–2024. Tax avoidance poses significant challenges to fiscal sustainability in emerging economies, particularly within highly regulated sectors such as banking. While prior studies primarily focus on general corporate characteristics, limited research integrates banking-specific prudential indicators into tax behavior analysis. Addressing this gap, this study examines the effects of profitability, leverage, firm size, audit quality, fixed asset intensity, and Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) on tax avoidance. Using purposive sampling, 24 banks were selected, generating 216 firm-year observations. Tax avoidance is proxied by Cash Effective Tax Rate (CETR), where a higher CETR reflects lower tax avoidance. Employing panel data regression analysis based on secondary financial statement data, the results reveal that leverage (DER), firm size, audit quality, fixed asset intensity, and CAR significantly influence tax avoidance, while profitability (ROA) shows no significant effect. Leverage, firm size, audit quality, and CAR negatively affect CETR, indicating higher tax avoidance, whereas fixed asset intensity positively affects CETR, indicating lower tax avoidance. These findings contribute to agency theory by incorporating regulatory capital considerations into corporate tax behavior analysis and provide practical implications for regulators in strengthening governance and tax compliance within the banking sector.

Keywords

Tax Avoidance CETR Profitability Leverage CAR

Article Details

How to Cite
Henri, H., & Puspitasari, E. (2026). Determinants of Tax Avoidance in Indonesian Conventional Banks Listed on the IDX. Golden Ratio of Taxation Studies, 6(1), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.52970/grts.v6i1.2120

References

  1. Ardiyanti, E., & Puspitasari, E. (2025). The Effect of Profitability , Leverage , Liquidity , Capital Intensity , and Corporate Social Responsibility in Tax Avoidance. 5(7), 49–63. https://goldenratio.id/index.php/grts/article/view/1528
  2. Ariska, M., Fahru, M., & Kusuma, I. W. (2020). Leverage, ukuran perusahaan, dan profitabilitas terhadap tax avoidance. Jurnal Revenue, 1(1), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.46306/rev.v1i1
  3. Ayu, G. A. P., & Kartika, A. (2019). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tax avoidance. Dinamika Akuntansi, Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 8(1), 64–78.
  4. Ayu, S. A. D. (2019). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tax avoidance pada perusahaan manufaktur. Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Indonesia.
  5. Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms? Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.02.003
  6. Desai, M. A., & Dharmapala, D. (2006). Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(1), 145–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.02.002
  7. Dewianawati, S., & Setiawan, D. (2021). Capital intensity dan penghindaran pajak. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Auditing Indonesia, 25(2), 123–138.
  8. Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. L. (2008). Long-run corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review, 83(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.61
  9. Fahmi, I. (2012). Pengantar manajemen keuangan. Alfabeta.
  10. Fajarwati, N., & Ramadhanti, W. (2021). Determinan tax avoidance pada perusahaan publik. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Pajak, 22(1), 45–59.
  11. Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  12. Hafizh, M. T., & Africa, L. A. (2022). Pengaruh intensitas aset tetap, pertumbuhan penjualan, kepemilikan institusional dan komite audit terhadap tax avoidance. Journal of Accounting and Financial Issue, 1–14.
  13. Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. In Journal of Accounting and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.002
  14. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  15. Kalbuana, N., Solihin, S., Saptono, A., Yohana, Y., & Yanti, D. (2020). Capital intensity dan tax avoidance. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 22(2), 89–102.
  16. Mardiasmo. (2013). Perpajakan. Andi.
  17. Novriyanti, I., & Warga Dalam, W. W. (2020). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penghindaran pajak. Journal of Applied Accounting and Taxation, 5(1), 24–35.
  18. Pratama, Y. P. (2023). Pengaruh leverage, profitabilitas, dan good governance terhadap penghindaran pajak. In Pajak.go.id.
  19. Pratiwi, R. (2015). Capital adequacy ratio dan kinerja bank. Jurnal Perbankan, 7(1), 33–47.
  20. Rahmayani, S., Riyadi, R., & Ginanjar, Y. (2021). Determinan tax avoidance. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 23(1), 65–80.
  21. Robin, R., Anggara, A., Tandrean, E., & Afiezan, A. (2021). Leverage dan tax avoidance. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 15(2), 120–134.
  22. Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
  23. Sulaeman, R. (2021). Pengaruh profitabilitas, leverage, dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap penghindaran pajak (tax avoidance). Syntax Idea, 3(2), 354–367.
  24. Supervision, B. C. on B. (2011). Basel III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems. Bank for International Settlements.
  25. Suryani, S. (2021). Corporate governance dan tax avoidance. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Auditing, 18(1), 34–48.
  26. Windayani, L. (2018). Analisis faktor-faktor potensial yang mempengaruhi penghindaran pajak. Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Ekonomi Program Studi Magister Akuntansi Universitas Islam Indonesia.
  27. Zhang, Y. (2019). An empirical analysis of the factors affecting the tax burden of China’s banking industry. Technology and Investment, 10, 27–44. https://doi.org/10.4236/ti.2019.102002