Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

Literature reviews are integral to academic research, providing synthesised insights into existing knowledge while identifying gaps for future exploration. This paper explores various types of literature reviews, including narrative, systematic, meta-analyses, scoping, critical, and integrative reviews. Each type is characterised by distinct methodologies and purposes, ranging from providing broad overviews to rigorous synthesis of evidence and quantitative data analysis. Understanding these methodologies aids researchers in selecting appropriate review methods tailored to their research questions, thereby enhancing the quality and impact of their work across disciplines.

Keywords

Literature Review Narrative Review Systematic Review Meta-Analysis

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Willie, M. (2026). Understanding Literature Reviews: Types, Methodologies, and Applications. Golden Ratio of Mapping Idea and Literature Format, 6(3), 2636–2641. https://doi.org/10.52970/grmilf.v6i3.490
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
  2. Christmals, C. D., & Gross, J. J. (2017). An integrative literature review framework for postgraduate nursing research reviews. European Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 5(1), 7. Retrieved from https://www.idpublications.org
  3. Dodgson, J. E. (2021). Critical Analysis: The Often-Missing Step in Conducting Literature Review Research. Journal of Human Lactation. https://doi.org/10.1177_0890334420977815
  4. Fink, A. (2014). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  5. Haidich, A. B. (2010). Meta-analysis in medical research. Hippokratia, 14(Suppl 1), 29-37. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3049418/
  6. Hansen, C., Steinmetz, H., & Block, J. (2022). How to conduct a meta-analysis in eight steps: A practical guide. Management Review Quarterly, 72, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00247-4
  7. Johnson, B. T., & Hennessy, E. A. (2019). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the health sciences: Best practice methods for research syntheses. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 233, 237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.035
  8. Laher, S., Fynn, A., & Kramer, S. (2019). Trends in social science research in Africa: Rigour, relevance and responsibility. In A. Boonzaier, C. Sharp, & S. van der Merwe (Eds.), Transforming Research Methods in the Social Sciences: Case Studies from South Africa (pp. 393-412). Wits University Press. https://doi.org/10.18772/22019032750.29
  9. Moosapour, H., Saeidifard, F., Aalaa, M., Soltani, A., & Larijani, B. (2021). The rationale behind systematic reviews in clinical medicine: A conceptual framework. Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders, 20(1), 919-929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-021-00773-8
  10. Munn, Z., Peters, M.D.J., Stern, C. et al. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol, 18, 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
  11. Paré, G., & Kitsiou, S. (2017). Chapter 9 Methods for literature reviews. In F. Lau & C. Kuziemsky (Eds.), Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Evidence-based Approach. Victoria (BC): University of Victoria. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK481583/
  12. Pigott, T. D., & Polanin, J. R. (2019). Methodological Guidance Paper: High-Quality Meta-Analysis in a Systematic Review. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319877153
  13. Post, C., Sarala, R., Gatrell, C., & Prescott, J. (2020). Advancing Theory with Review Articles. Journal of Management Studies, 57(2), 351-376. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12549
  14. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  15. Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404-428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606
  16. Toronto, C. (2020). Overview of the Integrative Review. In A Step-by-Step Guide to Conducting an Integrative Review (pp. 1-15). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37504-1_1
  17. Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2017). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971