Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

Natural resource management is crucial for sustainable development, especially in regions abundant in biodiversity and natural assets. Nations worldwide face the challenge of managing their resources effectively while promoting economic growth, social justice, and environmental conservation. Customary law plays a significant role in resource governance, particularly in countries like Indonesia and Australia, where indigenous communities have deep-rooted connections to the land and its resources. This comparative study explores the role of customary law in natural resource management in Indonesia and Australia. Both countries possess diverse ecosystems and substantial indigenous populations, offering valuable insights into the interaction between customary and state legal systems in resource governance. In Indonesia, customary law, known as adat, influences resource management practices, albeit with variations in recognition and integration into formal legal frameworks. Conversely, in Australia, the colonization process has disrupted traditional governance structures, leading to ongoing struggles for indigenous rights and recognition. By examining case studies, legal frameworks, and policy initiatives in both countries, this study aims to identify challenges and opportunities for integrating customary law into broader governance frameworks and promoting more equitable and sustainable resource management practices. Additionally, this comparative analysis contributes to scholarly debates on the role of customary law in contemporary legal systems and its implications for environmental governance, indigenous rights, and social justice. Interdisciplinary perspectives from legal studies, anthropology, environmental science, and development studies offer valuable insights for policymakers, practitioners, and indigenous communities striving for more inclusive and effective resource management approaches.

Keywords

Natural Resource Management Customary Law Indonesia Australia Indigenous Communities

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Buana, A. P., & Mamonto, M. A. W. W. (2023). The Role of Customary Law in Natural Resource Management: A Comparative Study between Indonesia and Australia. Golden Ratio of Mapping Idea and Literature Format, 3(2), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.52970/grmilf.v3i2.400
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Afiff, S., & Lowe, C. (2007). Claiming indigenous community: Political discourse and natural resource rights in Indonesia. Alternatives, 32(1), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/030437540703200104
  2. Boag, C. M. (2016). A Comparative Study of the Legal Frameworks Facilitating Indigenous Land Management in Postcolonial Societies: Indigenous Australia and Indonesian Adat Law. Brawijaya Law Journal, 3(2), 125–150. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2016.003.02.03
  3. Bola, M. (2017). Legal standing of customary land in indonesia: a comparative study of land administration systems. Hasanuddin Law Review, 3(2), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.20956/HALREV.V3I2.1132
  4. Chiu, H.-C., Hsieh, Y.-C., Li, Y.-C., & Lee, M. (2005). Relationship marketing and consumer switching behavior. Journal of Business Research, 58(12), 1681–1689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.11.005
  5. Cinner, J. E., Basurto, X., Fidelman, P., Kuange, J., Lahari, R., & Mukminin, A. (2012). Institutional designs of customary fisheries management arrangements in Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, and Mexico. Marine Policy, 36(1), 278–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2011.06.005
  6. Ewing, M. T. (2000). Brand and retailer loyalty: Past behavior and future intentions. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 9(2), 120–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10610420010322161
  7. Harly, L. (2023). Sustainable forest management from the perspective of customary law in Indonesia: a case study in the Bayan community. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.55681/ijssh.v1i1.324
  8. Hur, W.-M., & Kang, S. (2012). Interaction Effects of the Three Commitment Components on Customer Loyalty Behaviors. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 40(9), 1537–1541. https://doi.org/10.2224/SBP.2012.40.9.1537
  9. Knox, S. D., & Denison, T. J. (2000). Store loyalty: Its impact on retail revenue. An empirical study of purchasing behaviour in the UK. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 7(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-6989%2898%2900033-2
  10. Leisen, B., & Prosser, E. (2004). Customers’ Perception of Expensiveness and Its Impact on Loyalty Behaviors. Services Marketing Quarterly, 25(3), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1300/J396v25n03_03
  11. Liu, Y. (2007a). The Long-Term Impact of Loyalty Programs on Consumer Purchase Behavior and Loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 71(4), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.71.4.019
  12. Lombart, C., & Louis, D. (2012). Consumer satisfaction and loyalty: Two main consequences of retailer personality. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19(6), 644–652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2012.08.007
  13. Madiong, B. (2021). Constitutional rights of indigenous peoples in forest management in the perspective of justice. Indonesia Prime, 6(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.29209/id.v6i1.113
  14. Marta, A. D., Suwaryo, U., Sulaeman, A., & Agustino, L. (2019). Dilemma of customary land policy in Indonesia Dilema kebijakan tanah ulayat di Indonesia. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik, 32(2), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.20473/MKP.V32I22019.134-143
  15. McAlexander, J. H., Kim, S. K., & Roberts, S. D. (2003). Loyalty: The Influences of Satisfaction and Brand Community Integration. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 11(4), 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2003.11658504
  16. Mohammad Majid Mehmood, Bagram, & Shahzad Khan. (2012). Attaining Customer Loyalty! The Role of Consumer Attitude and Consumer Behavior.
  17. Mukhtar, S., A., C. M., & Chandra, D. (2023). Exploring The Influence Of Digital Marketing On Consumer Behavior And Loyalty. International Journal Of Research -Granthaalayah, 11(9). https://dx.doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v11.i9.2023.5308
  18. O’Connor, P. (1992). Aboriginal Land Rights at Common Law: Mabo v. Queensland. Monash UL Rev., 18, 251.
  19. Perez, A., del Mar Garc’ ia de los Salmones, M. ia, & Rodr’ iguez del Bosque, I. (2013). The effect of corporate associations on consumer behaviour. European Journal of Marketing, 47(1/2), 218–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561311285529
  20. S. Brasini & Giorgio Tassinari. (2002). The Impact Of Brand Loyalty And Promotion On Consumer Behaviour.
  21. Srivastava, M., & Kaul, D. (2016). Exploring the link between customer experience–loyalty–consumer spend. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 31, 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRETCONSER.2016.04.009
  22. Yasa, P. G. A. S., & Arya, P. G. (2021). Distribution and Revenue Sharing of Natural Resources in Indonesia: Autonomous Region and Legal Pluralism Perspective. Udayana Journal of Law and Culture, 5, 172–184. http://dx.doi.org/10.24843/UJLC.2021.v05.i02.p05
  23. Yim, C. K., & Kannan, P. K. (1999). Consumer Behavioral Loyalty: Journal of Business Research, 44(2), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963%2897%2900243-9
  24. Yusof, J. Mohd., Manan, H. A., Karim, N. Abd., & Kassim, N. A. Mohd. (2015). Customer’s Loyalty Effects of CSR Initiatives. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 170, 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015.01.020