Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

In the fast-paced environment of contemporary workplaces, characterized by a focus on innovation and collaboration, effective team communication stands out as a critical factor for organizational success. At the heart of such communication dynamics lies the concept of psychological safety—a shared belief within teams that encourages individuals to express themselves without fear of negative consequences. Recognized as a fundamental element for high-performing teams, psychological safety is now undergoing a paradigm shift in human resource (HR) practices, which traditionally concentrated on recruitment, training, and performance management. As organizations navigate the complexities of the global market, understanding and fostering psychological safety within teams have become imperative. This paper explores the multifaceted dimensions of psychological safety in team communication and its implications for contemporary HR practices. The groundwork for psychological safety was laid by Edgar Schein, whose seminal research emphasized the importance of trust and mutual respect in organizational settings. Drawing from social psychology theories, Schein highlighted psychological safety as a facilitator for authentic expression and constructive dialogue. Amy Edmondson's subsequent research further underscored the pivotal role of psychological safety, particularly in fostering open communication, learning, and innovation within teams. Psychological safety, defined as the perceived safety of interpersonal interaction, influences team communication and performance significantly. Various factors such as role-based characteristics, organizational trust, and empowering leadership contribute to its establishment. Trust moderates the relationship between work locus of control and psychological safety. Training interventions and individualized attention from managers have also been identified as means to enhance psychological safety, especially in interprofessional teams where it is crucial for effective communication and decision-making. Within psychologically safe teams, members feel empowered to voice opinions, share ideas, and challenge norms without fear of reprisal. This openness fosters a culture of constructive feedback and continuous improvement, driving innovation and problem-solving initiatives. Vulnerability, as advocated by Brené Brown, plays a crucial role in this context, facilitating authentic engagement and deeper relationships among team members. With the rise of remote work and virtual collaboration, the importance of psychological safety becomes even more pronounced. HR practices must adapt to foster psychological safety in virtual teams, leveraging technology to promote inclusivity and mitigate communication barriers.

Keywords

Psychological Safety Team Communication HR Practices Organizational Success Trust

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Paulus, P. (2023). The Role of Psychological Safety in Team Communication: Implications for Human Resource Practices. Golden Ratio of Mapping Idea and Literature Format, 3(2), 156–166. https://doi.org/10.52970/grmilf.v3i2.399
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Castro, S., Englmaier, F., & Guadalupe, M. (2022). Fostering psychological safety in teams: Evidence from an rct. Available at SSRN 4141538. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4141538
  2. Dusenberry, L., & Robinson, J. (2020). Building psychological safety through training interventions: Manage the team, not just the project. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 63(3), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2020.3014483
  3. Harper, S. R., & White, C. D. (2013). The Impact of Member Emotional Intelligence on Psychological Safety in Work Teams. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.21818/001c.17933
  4. Hennel, P., & Rosenkranz, C. (2020). Investigating the “Socio” in Socio-Technical Development: The Case for Psychological Safety in Agile Information Systems Development. Project Management Journal, 52(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820933057
  5. Henrichs, B. C. (2013). Psychological safety as a mediator of relational coordination in interdisciplinary hospital care units. Marquette University.
  6. Jain, A. K., Fennell, M. L., Chagpar, A. B., Connolly, H. K., & Nembhard, I. M. (2016). Moving toward improved teamwork in cancer care: the role of psychological safety in team communication. Journal of Oncology Practice, 12(11), 1000–1011. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2016.013300
  7. Jasper W. Hoenderdos. (2013). Towards an observational measure for team psychological safety.
  8. Jha, S. (2019). Team psychological safety and team performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 27(4), 903–924. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-10-2018-1567
  9. Joo, B.-K. (Brian), Yoon, S. K., & Galbraith, D. (2022). The effects of organizational trust and empowering leadership on group conflict: Psychological safety as a mediator. Organization Management Journal, 20(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/omj-07-2021-1308
  10. Kessel, M., Kratzer, J., & Schultz, C. (2012). Psychological Safety, Knowledge Sharing, and Creative Performance in Healthcare Teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(2), 147–157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2012.00635.x
  11. Krishnakumar, D., Caskey, R., & Hughes, A. M. (2021). Examining the Influence of Power Distance on Psychological Safety Within Healthcare Teams. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care, 10(1), 194–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/2327857921101130
  12. Mogård, E. V., Rørstad, O. B., & Bang, H. (2022). The Relationship between Psychological Safety and Management Team Effectiveness: The Mediating Role of Behavioral Integration. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1), 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010406
  13. Negara, A. I. S., Helmi, M. F., Wijaya, A. T., & Madistriyatno, H. (2023). How Important Psychological Safety is in Supporting Strategic Management to Achieve Success: A Narrative Literature Review. Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5), 1083–1091. https://doi.org/10.37275/oaijss.v6i5.175
  14. Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(7), 941–966. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.413
  15. O’Leary, D. F. (2016). Exploring the importance of team psychological safety in the development of two interprofessional teams. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 30(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2015.1072142
  16. Real, K., Hartsough, L., & Huddleston, L. C. (2021). Communicating in Medical Teams and Groups: Examining Psychological Safety and Simulation Training. In The Emerald Handbook of Group and Team Communication Research (pp. 475–492). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-500-120211030
  17. Setya Negara, A. I., M. Fachrizal Helmi, Ariesta Tohir Wijaya, & Harries Madistriyatno. (2023). How Important Psychological Safety is in Supporting Strategic Management to Achieve Success: A Narrative Literature Review. Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5), 1083–1091. https://doi.org/10.37275/oaijss.v6i5.175
  18. Triplett, S. M., & Loh, J. M. I. (2018). The moderating role of trust in the relationship between work locus of control and psychological safety in organisational work teams. Australian Journal of Psychology, 70(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12168
  19. Triplett, S. M., & Loh, J. M. I. (2018). The moderating role of trust in the relationship between work locus of control and psychological safety in organisational work teams. Australian Journal of Psychology, 70(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12168
  20. Wei, H., Chen, J., Chudhery, M. A. Z., & Fang, W. (2023). Empirically investigating the organizational identity mechanism of empowering leadership affecting the innovation performance of knowledge workers. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-10-2022-1429