Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of electronic-based archival arrangement innovations at the West Sumbawa Regency Personnel and Human Resources Development Agency (BKPSDM) as an effort to increase the effectiveness of personnel document management. The research uses a descriptive qualitative approach through in-depth interview techniques, observations, and documentation studies. The results of the study show that the application of an electronic archive system is able to increase time efficiency, facilitate access to information, and reduce the risk of document loss. This innovation also encourages transparency and accountability in public services. However, there are several obstacles, including the limitation of human resources who have information technology competencies and the need for a more stable network infrastructure. These findings affirm the importance of apparatus capacity strengthening strategies and technological support for the sustainability of digital innovation in personnel archive governance.

Keywords

Innovation Electronic Archive Personnel Management Public Services BKPSDM

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Syahrel, S., & Khadafie, M. (2026). Innovation in Electronic-Based Archive Arrangement at the Personnel and Human Resources Development Agency of West Sumbawa Regency. Golden Ratio of Mapping Idea and Literature Format, 6(2), 1363–1373. https://doi.org/10.52970/grmilf.v6i2.1753
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Al-Omari, H. A., & Al-Qudah, M. F. (2020). Electronic records management and organizational performance: Evidence from Jordanian public organizations. Records Management Journal, 30(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-09-2019-0055
  2. Alvarez, R., & Evans, J. (2019). Digital records management in public sector organizations: Towards transparency and accountability. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.004
  3. Ammary, Z., & Hameed, A. (2021). Implementation of electronic document management systems in government institutions: Opportunities and challenges. Government Information Quarterly, 38(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101567
  4. Budiarto, T., & Prabowo, H. (2019). Implementasi e-arsip dalam mendukung tata kelola pemerintahan yang baik. Jurnal Manajemen dan Organisasi, 10(3), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.29244/jmo.v10i3.29472
  5. Duranti, L., & Blanchette, J.-F. (2002). The authenticity of electronic records: The InterPARES approach. School of Library, Archival and Information Studies. Retrieved from https://www.interpares.org/
  6. Duranti, L., & Rogers, C. (2020). Trusting records in the cloud: The implications of digital archiving. Records Management Journal, 30(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-07-2019-0034
  7. Gartika, D. (2024). A case study from Bali Province, Indonesia — e-government management and e-records (JeDEM). JeDEM — Journal of e-Democracy and Open Government, 16(1). Retrieved from https://jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/898.
  8. Gilliland-Swetland, A. J. (2020). Concepts of records and archives. Archival Science, 20(2), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-020-09340-8
  9. Heeks, R. (2008). Benchmarking eGovernment: Improving the national and international measurement, evaluation and comparison of eGovernment. Evaluation, 14(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389007084673
  10. Indrawati, A., & Wibowo, T. (2018). Electronic document management systems and the transformation of public service: Case study in Indonesia. Information Development, 34(4), 394–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666917725995
  11. International Organization for Standardization. (2016). ISO 15489-1:2016 Information and documentation — Records management — Part 1: Concepts and principles. ISO. Retrieved from https://committee.iso.org/sites/tc46sc11/home/projects/published/iso-15489-records-management.html
  12. International Organization for Standardization. (2017). ISO 23081-1:2017 Information and documentation — Metadata for records — Part 1: Principles. ISO. Retrieved from https://committee.iso.org/sites/tc46sc11/home/projects/published/iso-23081-metadata-for-records.html
  13. Johnston, G. P., & Bowen, D. V. (2005). The benefits of electronic records management systems: A general review of published and some unpublished cases. Records Management Journal, 15(3), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565690510632319.
  14. Katuu, S. (2018). Managing digital records in a global environment: Challenges and opportunities. Information Development, 34(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666916686462
  15. Makmur, S. (2023). Implementation of archives digitization policy as a form of government digitalization in Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific Research, (article). Retrieved from https... (dokumen kebijakan/analisis Indonesia).
  16. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  17. Ngoepe, M., & Saurombe, A. (2016). Provisions for managing electronic records in the public sector in South Africa. Journal of the South African Society of Archivists, 49(1), 92–110. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC194205
  18. Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 95 Tahun 2018 tentang Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (Perpres No. 95/2018). (2018). Retrieved from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/96913/perpres-no-95-tahun-2018.
  19. Renaud, K., & Blignaut, R. J. (2017). Why is security behaviour so hard to change? Information & Computer Security, 25(3), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-11-2016-0089
  20. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
  21. Setiawan, R., & Mulyono, A. (2020). Tantangan pengelolaan arsip digital dalam era transformasi birokrasi. Jurnal Kearsipan, 14(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.20473/jk.v14i1.2020.15-28
  22. Sprehe, J. T. (2005). The positive benefits of electronic records management in the context of enterprise content management. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 297–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.02.003.
  23. Suharyanto, A. (2021). Inovasi digitalisasi arsip dalam peningkatan efektivitas pelayanan publik. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 8(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.15294/jap.v8i2.5432
  24. Sulistyo-Basuki. (2019). Pengantar ilmu kearsipan. Rajawali Pers. Gil-García, J. R., & Pardo, T. A. (2005). E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 187–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.02.001
  25. Weerakkody, V., El-Haddadeh, R., Sabol, T., Ghoneim, A., & Dzupka, P. (2015). E-government implementation strategies in developed and transition economies: A comparative study. International Journal of Information Management, 35(3), 466–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.04.002
  26. Yunus, M., & Arifin, A. (2022). Tantangan tata kelola arsip di era digital: Studi kasus lembaga pemerintahan daerah. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 9(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.31943/jian.v9i1.411