Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the collaboration and innovation strategies between stakeholders in the management of Water Resources (SDA) by the Public Works Department (PU) through integrated mixed-method design. The case study approach is applied to several Public Works Office units with variations of policies, geographical conditions, and institutional capacity. Qualitative data obtained through in -depth interviews, Focus Group Discussions (FGD), and analysis of policy documents. Thematic analysis is used to identify driving factors and collaboration barriers, as well as the form of innovation applied. Meanwhile, quantitative data is collected through a survey related to the effectiveness of collaboration, water service innovation index, and operational performance indicators, which are then analyzed with multilevel regression to test the linkages between variables, supported by the validity and reliability of instruments. The results showed that multi -vessel collaboration had a significant effect on the effectiveness of natural resource management. Collaborative leadership, clarity of regulations, and inter-actors is the main factor that encourages cooperation. However, the pattern of collaboration is still ad-hoc and has not been supported by formal institutional mechanisms. In terms of innovation, the use of digital technology and sensorization began to be implemented, although constrained infrastructure, technical competence, and bureaucratic resistance. Quantitative analysis confirms that the quality of collaboration is more dominant in improving service performance and water distribution justice, while technology innovation contributes to operational efficiency. Integration of findings through Design-based Research (DBR) produces an implementative strategy in the form of permanent multi-stakeholder forums, regulatory strengthening, co-creation of innovation models, digitalization acceleration, and increasing human resource capacity. Policy recommendations emphasize the importance of monitoring systems based on the main performance indicator (KPI) which includes technical, social and ecological dimensions.

Keywords

Collaboration Innovation Stakeholders Water Resources Public Works

Article Details

How to Cite
Satriawan, D., & Khadafie, M. (2026). Collaboration and Innovation Strategies between Stakeholders in the Management of Water Resources by the Public Works Department. Golden Ratio of Mapping Idea and Literature Format, 6(2), 1337–1348. https://doi.org/10.52970/grmilf.v6i2.1750

References

  1. Abdurrohim, A. (2024). Pengelolaan dan perencanaan sumber daya air: Tantangan, solusi, dan peran masyarakat dalam era perubahan iklim.
  2. Aisyah, N. (2024). Analisis dampak alih fungsi lahan pertanian pada proyek Tol Solo–Jogja terhadap kondisi sosial ekonomi masyarakat di Kabupaten Klaten (Skripsi). Universitas Islam Negeri Prof. KH Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto.
  3. Arif, M. (2025). Collaborative governance dalam pembangunan jalan khusus batubara di Provinsi Jambi. Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri.
  4. Bumdes, politik tata kelola, & studi kasus kerjasama pengelolaan BUMDes Gerbang. (n.d.). Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik.
  5. Djazuli, R. A. (2024). Evaluasi program pemberdayaan masyarakat. UMG Press.
  6. Etika, ditinjau dari perspektif administrasi negara. (2024). Kebijakan publik dan aplikasinya.
  7. Gemilang, F. S., & Fitriyah. (2025). Kolaborasi pemerintah pusat dan daerah dalam proyek strategis nasional Sodetan Ciliwung: Studi implementasi collaborative governance. Journal of Politics and Government Studies, 14(2), 1364–1379.
  8. Guo, J., & Mallinson, D. J. (2025). Dilemmas in collaborative public sector innovation: The case of state energy efficiency policy. Policy Design and Practice, 1–15.
  9. Haq, F. A., Musyafa, D. A., & Rosidin, U. (2025). Desentralisasi dan harmonisasi kebijakan: Rekonstruksi pembagian kewenangan antara pemerintah pusat dan daerah dalam negara kesatuan. Qanuniya: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), 17–30.
  10. Jaya, I. E. E. (2024). Pengembangan sumber daya air. Universitas Muhadi Setiabudi.
  11. Juita, F., Effendi, M., & Maryam, S. (2025). Buku ajar mata kuliah metode penelitian kualitatif: Penelitian kualitatif untuk menilik berbagai fenomena sosial. Penerbit NEM.
  12. Kayode-Bolarinwa, G. (2024). Enhancing collaboration and stakeholder engagement for successful IT solution deployments in the public sector: A study on Lagos State public sector.
  13. Lathifah, H., Frinaldi, A., Asnil, & Putri, N. E. (2024). Analisis akuntabilitas birokrasi publik dalam sistem keuangan daerah dan dampaknya terhadap kinerja pelayanan publik. Professional: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Administrasi Publik, 11(2), 585–592.
  14. Markus, F. (2025). Pemerintah desa dalam pengelolaan air bersih (Penelitian di Desa Setungkup Kalimantan Barat). Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa “APMD”.
  15. Novita, A. A. (2025). Governance for sustainable development. Selaras Media Kreasindo.
  16. Rifa’i, I. J., Budiman, H., Yuhandra, E., & Aisyah, M. R. (2025). Politik hukum pengelolaan sumber daya air di Sumur Tujuh Cikajayaan dalam menjamin hak masyarakat lokal. Amsir Law Journal, 6(2), 94–105.
  17. Satriawan, P. (2024). Peran Dinas Pekerjaan Umum dan Penataan Ruang (PUPR) dalam sistem pengelolaan air limbah domestik berdasarkan Peraturan Bupati Kaur Nomor 99 Tahun 2021 perspektif fiqh siyasah. UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu.
  18. Sentanu, I. G. E. P. S., Yustiari, S. H., & AP, M. S. (2024). Mengelola kolaborasi stakeholder dalam pelayanan publik. PT Indonesia Delapan Kreasi Nusa.
  19. Setijaningrum, E. (2024). Tata kelola kebijakan di era VUCA.
  20. Subkhan, F. (2025). Model pengelolaan ekonomi digital untuk ketahanan dan daya saing ekonomi.
  21. Syahwal, & Gunawan, M. N. (2024). Hak yang mengering: Kuasa modal terhadap hak atas air di Cikeusal. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 54(4), 781–806.
  22. Zacharias, T., Wulandari, F. R., & Iskandar, A. (2025). Administrasi publik dan teknologi informasi. Greenbook Publisher.