Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the relationship between Big Five Personality and innovative work behavior case study from Liquid Petroleum Gas (LPG) depot owners and employees in Tegal Regency, Indonesia. This study uses a quantitative approach with the correlational design method, while the data analysis technique includes instrument testing consisting of validity and reliability tests. After the instrument test, model and hypothesis testing were carried out to analyze the data. Data was collected through an e-survey using Google Forms and distributed to various LPG depots in the Tegal Regency. The research sample used a purposive sampling technique of 153 respondents selected to represent the population. This study lasted two months, from October to November 2024, to better understand the factors influencing innovative behavior in LPG distribution. The hypothesis test results showed that of the five dimensions of Big Five Personality, only Conscientiousness and Agreeableness significantly influence Innovative Work Behavior, with a value of t = 2.536, Sig. = 0.012 for Conscientiousness and t = 2.268, Sig. = 0.025 for Agreeableness. Meanwhile, Openness to Experience (t = 0.469, Sig. = 0.640), Extraversion (t = -0.812, Sig. = 0.418), and Neuroticism (t = 0.809, Sig. = 0.420) do not have a significant effect on Innovative Work Behavior because their significance values are greater than 0.05. Thus, not all personality dimensions have a significant role in encouraging innovative work behavior.

Keywords

Personality Assessment Employee Performance Innovative Work Behavior Big Five Personality Innovation

Article Details

How to Cite
Suciana, F., & Mansyur, A. (2025). Exploration of the Influence of Big Five Personality Traits on Innovative Behavior . Golden Ratio of Human Resource Management, 5(2), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.52970/grhrm.v5i2.970

References

  1. Alwisol. (2009). Psikologi Kepribadian: Konsep, Teori, dan Aplikasi. Penerbit Andi.
  2. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. Westview Press.
  3. Batey, M., et al. (2010). The Relationship Between Openness to Experience and Creative Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review., 14(3), 207–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310375865
  4. Cervone, D., & Pervin, L. A. (2012). Personality: Theory and Research. Wiley.
  5. Costa, P., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Neo PI-R professional manual. January 1992.
  6. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1997). Personality Trait Structures as a Human Universal. American Psychologist, 52(5), 509–516.
  7. De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behavior. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x
  8. Feist, J., & Feist, G. J. (2009). Theories of Personality. McGraw-Hill.
  9. Friedman, H. S., & Schusstack, M. W. (2006). Personality: Classic theories and modern research (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.
  10. Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and Individual Differences: The Search for Universals in Personality Lexicons. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 2(1), 141–165.
  11. Janssen, O. (2000). Perilaku Kerja Inovatif: Definisi, Dimensi, dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
  12. Jirásek, M., & Sudzina, F. (2020). Big Five personality traits and creativity. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 24(3), 90–105. https://doi.org/10.12776/QIP.V24I3.1509
  13. Karwowski, M., et al. (2013). Creative self-efficacy and the role of creativity in predicting creative behavior. Personality and Individual Differences., 54(5), 548–553. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.012
  14. Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity. Review of General Psychology., 17(1), 8–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032139
  15. King, L. A. (2010). The science of psychology: An appreciative view. (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  16. Larsen, R. J., & Buss, D. M. (2010). Personality Psychology: Domains of Knowledge About Human Nature. Pearson Education.
  17. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective. (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
  18. Pratiwi, A., et al. (2021). Public Sentiment Analysis to Support Indonesian Government Induction Stove Program. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376614991
  19. Setiawan, A. (2020). Rancang Bangun Sistem Pendistribusian Rantai Pasok Gas LPG Berbasis Website (Studi Kasus: PT. Jember Sentosa Abadi). Prosiding SENATIK. https://doi.org/https://prosiding.unipma.ac.id/index.php/SENATIK/article/view/6149
  20. Silvia, P. J., et al. (2014). Openness to Experience and Creativity: Exploring the Role of Personality in the Creativity Process. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts., 8(1), 17–25.
  21. Stock, R. M., von Hippel, E., & Gillert, R. (2016). The Role of Openness to Experience in the Ideation Phase of Innovation. Creativity Research Journal., 28(4), 365–376. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1216453
  22. Sung, S. Y., & Choi, J. N. (2009). The role of work environments for creativity: A meta-analytic review. Social Science & Medicine., 68(5), 748–758. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.12.025
  23. Chen, J. & Huang, H. (2024). The influence of big five personality traits on depression and suicidal behavior.. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1006564
  24. Kumar, P. and Lavanya, V. (2024). Igniting work innovation: performance pressure, extraversion, feedback seeking, and innovative behavior. Management Decision, 62(5), 1598-1617. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-05-2023-0839
  25. Kundi, Y., Sardar, S., & Badar, K. (2021). Linking performance pressure to employee work engagement: the moderating role of emotional stability. Personnel Review, 51(3), 841-860. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-05-2020-0313
  26. Liu, X., Huang, Y., Kim, J., & Na, S. (2023). How does ethical leadership cultivate innovative work behaviors in employees? Psychological safety, work engagement, and openness to experience. Sustainability, 15(4), 3452. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043452
  27. Muksoud, N., Metwally, F., & Ata, A. (2022). Leadership behaviors and innovative work behaviors among nurses. Zagazig Nursing Journal, 18(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21608/znj.2022.244982
  28. Qie, Y. (2023). Individual's personality traits, perception of hrm practices on innovative work behavior: innovative climate as a mediator. IJOMSR, 6(5), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.53469/ijomsr.2023.6(05).11
  29. Shah, S., Shah, S., & El‐Gohary, H. (2022). Nurturing innovative work behavior through workplace learning among knowledge workers of small and medium businesses. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(4), 3616–3639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-01019-5
  30. Yang, M., Tuấn, L., & Qian, D. (2021). Group diversity and employee service innovative behavior in the hospitality industry: a multilevel model. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 34(2), 808-835. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-06-2021-0822
  31. Priyadi, S., & Patria, B. (2023). Validitas Struktur Internal Big Five Inventory-15 pada Data Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS5). Retrieved from etd.repository.gum.ac.id
  32. Alawiyah, T. (2018). Uji Validitas Konstruk Big Five Inventory melalui Analisis Faktor Konfirmatori pada Wanita Wirausaha di Pulomerak, Banten. Jurnal Psikologi dan Pendidikan Islam, 3(2), 117-130. Retrieved from journal.uinjkt.ac.id
  33. De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring Innovative Work Behavior. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36.
  34. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. Westview Press.
  35. Janssen, O. (2000). Job Demands, Perceptions of Effort-Reward Fairness and Innovative Work Behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302.