Main Article Content

Abstract

One type of criminal offense that is often committed by Indonesian National Army (TNI) Soldiers is the crime of desertion as regulated in Law Number 39 of 1947 concerning the Military Criminal Code (KUHPM) precisely in Article 87 which is an act committed by a TNI Soldier to leave military service without superior permission, at a specified time and place. The crime of desertion has the main characteristic of unauthorized absence committed by an army person at a place. The absence can be in the form of traveling to a place, hiding oneself, crossing the enemy, entering the military service of another country, or deliberately making oneself left behind. The settlement of cases of desertion crimes often finds several problems, one of which is that the person who committed the crime of desertion cannot be found, which causes the examination process to be carried out in the absence of the defendant (In Absentia). In Absentia, an examination is carried out so that the case is resolved quickly to uphold the discipline of soldiers and maintain the integrity of the troops. Including the case of the case submission that was not examined because from the beginning, the defendant fled and was not found again within 6 (six) consecutive months from the date of submission of the case file and 3 (three) consecutive summons efforts have been made. An examination can be conducted and decided without the defendant's presence in court.

Keywords

Desertion In Absentia Military

Article Details

How to Cite
Nainggolan, Y., & Esther, J. . (2025). Legal Settlement of The Crime of Desertion in Absentia in The Jurisdiction of Military Court I-02. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 5(2), 278–283. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v5i2.823

References

  1. Habeahan, Gebi Vani dan July Esther. (2024) Proses Pengajuan Rencana Tuntutan Oleh Oditur Militer Terhadap Perkara Pidana Prajurit TNI. Jurnal Gagasan Hukum, Vol.6 No.2. https://doi.org/10.31849/jgh.v6i02.24375
  2. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Militer.
  3. Law Number 34 of 2004 Concerning the Indonesian National Army.
  4. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 1997 Concerning Military Justice
  5. Prakoso, Djoko (1994). Peradilan In Absentia Di Indonesia, Jakarta Timur: Ghalia Indonesia.
  6. Purnama, E. (2025). Formulation of Liability and Criminal Policy of Justice Collaborator of Corruption in Indonesia. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review, 5(1), e04319-e04319.
  7. Salam, Moch. Faisal. (2002). Hukum Acara Pidana Militer di Indonesia, Bandung: Mandar Maju
  8. Shah, S. (2021). Fear and External Military Security Vs. Internal Human Security: The Case of Pakistan (Doctoral dissertation, University of Bath).
  9. Sulistiwo, Agus Prambowo, Joko Sriwidodo, dan Hedwig A. (2023). Pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan Militer In Absentia Terhadap Anggota TNI yang Desersi. Qiyas, Vol. 8 No. 1.
  10. Syawaluddinsyah. Romli SA, dan Ruben Achmad. (2021). Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Desersi Secara In Absentia yang dilakukan Oleh Prajurit TNI di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Militer I-04 Palembang (Studi Kasus Nomor 125-K/PM I- 04/AD/VII/2018. Jurnal Hukum Doctrinal, Vol. 6 No. 2.
  11. Warsono. (2019). Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Desersi Secara In Absentia di Pengadilan Militer II-10 Semarang. Jurnal Spektrum Hukum, Vol. 16 No.1.
  12. Wibowo, D. P. (2023). The Decide Trials in Absentia in Desertion Crimes. Ius Poenale, 4(1), 61-74.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.