Main Article Content

Abstract

Most of the people of Sumuri District make a living as farmers, especially fruit and vegetable farmers. Local fruit plants that are commonly cultivated include bananas, papaya, mangoes, oranges, rambutan, pineapple and water guava. One of the obstacles experienced by the community is the presence of pests that attack the fruit, causing poor fruit and even crop failure. This prompted a field survey of fruit flies in community fruit plantations. The field survey was conducted in October-December 2023 in Tofoi Village, Materabu Jaya Village and Forada Village, Sumuri District, Bintuni Bay. The survey was conducted using the trapping method with Steiner model traps that have been modified from mineral water bottles and the addition of native fruit samples and Methyl Eugenol (ME) with petrogenol trademark. Traps were set for three days and then identification and collection of fruit fly samples were carried out. The results showed that the highest population of fruit flies was in pineapple (Annanas commosus), which was 738 and the least in water guava (Syzygeum aqueum), which was 324. There were nine fruit fly species identified from this study, including: Bactrocera umbrosa (Fabricus), B.carambolae (Drew and Hancock), B.dorsalis (Hendel), B.curreyi (Drew), B.curvifera (Walker), B.emittens (Walker), B.papayae (Drew and Hancock), B.tryoni (Froggatt) and Procecidochares connexa (Macquart)

Keywords

Fruit Flies Populations Fruit Crops

Article Details

How to Cite
Susiamti, W., Panjaitan, R. ., & Binur, R. . (2024). Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) Populations on Same Fruit Crops in Sumuri District, Bintuni Bay. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 4(2), 196–200. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v4i2.443

References

  1. Drew, R. A. I., dan D. L. Hancock. (1994). The Bactrocera Dorsalis Complex Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tepritidae: Dacinae) in Asia. Bul of Entomol ReS upp (2): 68.
  2. Evrizal E, Budidarsono S & Prasmatiwi FE. (2004). Land Use History, Land Use Intensity and Sosioeconomic background of Lampung Benchmark Area, Sumberjaya Window, Indonesia. CSM BGBD Project Report, Bandar Lampung.
  3. Hasyim, A., Sudarmo., Nurhadi., M. Agus. (2008). Identifikasi, status dan pengelolaan lalat buah di Indonesia. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian (BPTP). J. Hortikultura. Surabaya
  4. Isnaini, Y. (2013). Identifikasi Spesies dan Kelimpahan Lalat Buah Bactrocera spp Di Kabupaten Demak. Univesitas Negeri Semarang.
  5. Jusmanto, Nasir B, Yunus M. (2019). Daya tarik metil eugenol terhadap populasi lalat buah (Bactrocera sp.) pada berbagai ketinggian dan warna perangkap pada pertanaman cabai berah. Jurnal Agrotekbis. 7 (1): 10–19.
  6. Kardinan A. (2019). Prospek insektisida nabati berbahan aktif Metil Eugenol (C12H24O2) sebagai pengendali hama lalat buah Bactrocera spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae) Prospect of Methyl Eugenol (C12H24O2) as Active Ingredient of Botanical Insecticide for Fruit Flies Control Bact. Perspektif. 18 (1):16.
  7. Pujiastuti Y. (2020). Keanekaragaman dan pola keberadaan lalat buah (Diptera: Tephritidae) di Provinsi Sumatera Selatan. Jurnal Entomologi Indonesia. 17 (3): 125.
  8. Putra, N. S. (1997). Hama Lalat Buah dan Pengendaliannya. Kanisius. Yogyakarta.
  9. Rowan, D. D. (2011).Volatile metabolites. Review. Jurnal Metabolites 1: 41-63
  10. Wahyunita. (2019). Respons Serangga Terhadap Senyawa-Senyawa Velotil yang Bersumber. Dari Buah Nenas (Ananas comosus L Merr.) Dan Nangka (Artocarpus heterophyllus L.) Di Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit. Medan: Universitas Sumatera Utara.