Main Article Content

Abstract

This research investigates the influence of organizational culture on auditing practices within audit firms. The study aims to explore how various dimensions of organizational culture, including leadership style, communication patterns, ethical climate, teamwork, and risk orientation, shape auditing processes. The research adopts a qualitative approach, utilizing literature review, interviews with audit professionals, and data analysis to derive key insights. Findings reveal that leadership style significantly impacts the ethical climate within audit firms, with transformational leadership fostering a positive ethical climate conducive to high-quality auditing practices. Effective communication channels enhance collaboration and teamwork among audit teams, leading to improved audit outcomes. Moreover, a prudent risk management culture prioritizes audit quality and professionalism, while a risk-seeking or risk-averse culture may compromise audit effectiveness. The study contributes to the existing literature by offering nuanced insights into how specific cultural attributes within audit firms influence auditing practices. The findings underscore the importance of cultivating a positive organizational culture to enhance audit quality and professionalism.

Keywords

Organizational Culture Auditing Practices Leadership Style Communication Patterns Ethical Climate Teamwork Risk Orientation

Article Details

How to Cite
Rahman, C. . (2020). Organizational Culture and Its Influence on Auditing Practices: A Case Study in Audit Firms. Golden Ratio of Auditing Research, 1(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.52970/grar.v1i1.363

References

  1. Abbott, L. J., Daugherty, B. E., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2016). Internal audit outsourcing and the risk of misleading or fraudulent financial reporting: Did Sarbanes-Oxley get it wrong? Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(1), 212–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12162
  2. Alberti, F. G., Lanza, A., & Trucco, S. (2020). Leadership in audit firms: A research framework and empirical evidence. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(6), 1635–1663. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2019-3887
  3. Alderfer, C. P., & Smith, K. K. (1982). Studying intergroup relations embedded in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(1), 35–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392238
  4. Andiola, L., Laisney, F., & Rous, P. (2020). The role of audit quality in the relationship between organizational commitment and auditor performance. International Journal of Auditing, 24(3), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12155
  5. Aobdia, D., & Gramlich, J. (2016). Audit firm internal organization and audit quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(4), 931–982. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12113
  6. Argote, L. (1999). Organizational learning: Creating, retaining and transferring knowledge. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  7. Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 421–449. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621
  8. Baldacchino, P. J., Bologna, L. J., & Pacifico, A. A. (2016). Auditor’s organizational structure and culture and audit quality. Research in Accounting Regulation, 28(2), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.racreg.2016.07.004
  9. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  10. Brazel, J. F., Jones, K. L., Thibodeau, J. C., & Wood, D. A. (2010). Mandatory IFRS reporting and changes in enforcement. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(3), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.08.002
  11. Brown, M. E., & Leigh, T. W. (1996). A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.358
  12. Brown, M. E., & Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Ethical and unethical leadership: Exploring new avenues for future research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(4), 583–616. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201020445
  13. Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1217–1234. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159921
  14. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
  15. Fauziah, S. (2011). The impact of organizational culture and governance practices on audit quality. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 10(4), 492–514.
  16. Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (1989). Business ethics: Ethical decision making and cases. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  17. Gibson, C. B., & Vermeulen, F. (2003). A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 202–239. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556620
  18. Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (2002). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 45(3), 730–748. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069301
  19. Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1991). The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financial Management, 20(4), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.2307/3665628
  20. Hermawan, A., & Jamal, K. (2015). Organizational culture and audit quality: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Auditing, 19(3), 230–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12047
  21. Hurtt, R. K., Brown-Liburd, H., & Earley, C. E. (2010). The impact of auditor moral reasoning on auditor sensitivity to ethical contextual factors. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(7), 779–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2010.07.001
  22. Indrayati, S. W., & Wibisono, T. (2021). The effect of audit quality on firm performance: The mediating role of organizational commitment. International Journal of Business and Society, 22(1), 115–131.
  23. Jackson, A., & Moldrich, M. (2014). The impact of organizational culture on audit quality: A review of the literature. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 10(6), 635–644.
  24. Krishnan, J. (2005). The impact of risk management and governance on audit quality: Evidence from banking. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(4), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.05.004
  25. Mak, A. S., Westwood, M. J., Ishiyama, F. I., Barker, M. C., & Elliot, J. L. (2009). Cultural intelligence: Antecedents and outcomes of coworker trust in multicultural work groups. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33(5), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2009.05.003
  26. Morris, B., & Omer, T. C. (2014). The role of internal audit in the corporate governance process: A synthesis of the literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 33(1), 42–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2014.02.002
  27. Ponemon, L. A., & Gabhart, D. R. (1992). Ethical reasoning and selection-socialization in accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(3-4), 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(92)90004-M
  28. Schein, E. H. (1984). Coming to a new awareness of organizational culture. Sloan Management Review, 25(2), 3–16.
  29. Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance service providers' professional skepticism: A behavioral analysis. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 21(2), 89–113.
  30. Sitkin, S. B., & Pablo, A. L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Academy of Management Review, 17(1), 9–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/258761
  31. Trevino, L. K., Butterfield, K. D., & McCabe, D. L. (1998). The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 447–476. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857431
  32. Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 101–125. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392857