Auditors' Perception on Ethical Responsibility in Auditing: A Qualitative Study

Main Article Content

Ari Wijaya
Bella Suryani
Cindy Pratama
Dito Permadi
Eka Putri

Abstract

This qualitative study explores auditors' perceptions of ethical responsibility in auditing, aiming to elucidate the multifaceted dynamics shaping their attitudes and behaviors. The research delves into various dimensions of ethical behavior, organizational factors, professional standards, and regulatory frameworks influencing auditors' conduct. Through thematic analysis of existing literature, key concepts related to ethical responsibility in auditing are defined, and specific aspects pertinent to the research context are elucidated. The study highlights the critical role of ethical behavior in maintaining public trust and confidence in financial reporting, emphasizing principles of integrity, objectivity, independence, and professional competence. Organizational culture, professional norms, and regulatory oversight mechanisms are identified as influential factors shaping auditors' ethical decisions and actions. Moreover, the research underscores the importance of professional skepticism and independence as essential components of auditors' ethical responsibility, emphasizing their role in enhancing audit quality and deterring financial misconduct. The findings contribute to theoretical discourse on auditing ethics, enriching our understanding of the ethical imperatives governing auditors' conduct. Furthermore, practical implications for auditing firms, regulatory bodies, and professional associations are discussed, with recommendations for promoting ethical conduct and integrity within the profession.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wijaya, A. ., Suryani, B. ., Pratama, C. ., Permadi, D. ., & Putri, E. . (2020). Auditors’ Perception on Ethical Responsibility in Auditing: A Qualitative Study. Golden Ratio of Auditing Research, 1(1), 01–10. https://doi.org/10.52970/grar.v1i1.360
Section
Articles

References

Anderson, U. (1998). The auditor's responsibility for fraud detection: A study of the effects of fraud detectability and evidence reliability. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 17(1), 27-47. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.1998.17.1.27

Barrainkua, I. (2018). Balancing between professionalism and commercialism: An empirical study on the ethical behaviour of auditors. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(2), 497-514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3187-1

Chow, C. W. (2014). The effects of client identity strength and professional commitment on auditors' ethical judgments. *Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(2), 43-66. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50681

DeFond, M., Raghunandan, K., & Subramanyam, K. R. (2020). Regulation and the interdependence of audit quality and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 35(1), 112–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X19882815

Gul, F. A., Fung, S. Y. K., & Jaggi, B. (2019). The effect of auditor reputation and auditor independence on audit fees. European Accounting Review, 28(4), 677–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2018.1480361

Hurtt, R. K., Brown-Liburd, H., & Earley, C. E. (2018). Auditors' ethical decision-making: The effects of the moral intensity of the issue and motivation. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(3), 187–208. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-52001

Jeffrey, R. (2004). Independence threats and cultural constructs: A study of the ethical judgments of Australian auditors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(2), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2004.23.2.147

Johari, F. (2013). Influence of independence threat on auditors' ethical judgment: The role of moral intensity. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 2(1), 57-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-012-0017-5

Klein, J. M., Owens, B. P., Morris, S. B., & Beasley, W. S. (2020). Can one bad apple spoil the bunch? A meta-analysis of the impact of organizational ethical climate on organizational deviance. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(4), 905–928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4029-y

Louwers, T. J., Ramsay, R. J., Sinason, D. H., Strawser, J. R., & Thibodeau, J. C. (2017). Auditing & assurance services (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Schelluch, P. (1997). The expectations gap: Factors influencing auditors' responsibilities. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 16(1), 121-147. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.1997.16.1.121

Shafer, W. E. (2001). Auditors' judgments about ethical issues: The impact of client integrity and competence and auditor gender. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 13(1), 263-285. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2001.13.1.263

Shaub, M. K., Warne, R. T., Rowe, R. M., & Kearns, J. R. (2019). Auditors’ perceptions of unethical client pressure tactics: An exploratory qualitative analysis. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 38(3), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-52384

Sweeney, B. (2010). Ethical evaluations and intentions: Exploring the impact of firm and individual level variables. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(4), 573-595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0531-3