Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the moderating effect of leverage on earnings per share, company size, liquidity, and activity on the financial performance of manufacturing companies in 2019-2024. This study uses a quantitative method with the help of the statistical program EViews 13.0. Data were collected using secondary data from the financial reports of manufacturing companies from to 2019-2024. The data analysis technique used a regression model, namely, the Panel Data Regression Moderating Variables approach. The results of this study indicate that earnings per share has a positive effect on company financial performance, company size has a positive effect on company financial performance, liquidity has no effect on company financial performance, and activity has no effect on company financial performance. The moderating impact of leverage has a significant negative effect on earnings per share on company financial performance, leverage moderation has a significant negative effect on company size on company financial performance, leverage moderation has no effect on liquidity on company financial performance, and leverage moderation has a significant positive effect on company activity on company financial performance.

Keywords

Leverage Earning per Share Firm Size Liquidity Firm Performance

Article Details

How to Cite
Fikri, A., & Gusni, G. (2026). The Moderating Role of Leverage on Earnings Per Share, Company Size, Liquidity, and Activity on the Financial Performance of Manufacturing Companies in 2019-2024. Golden Ratio of Auditing Research, 7(1), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.52970/grar.v7i1.2597

References

  1. Alikaj, Cau, & Efrain. (2017). Differentiating the impact of CSR strengths and concerns on firm performance. Journal of Management Development, 401-409.
  2. Arhinful, R., & Radmehr, M. (2023). The Effect of Financial Leverage on Financial Performance: Evidence from Non-Financial Institutions Listed on the Tokyo Stock Market. Journal of Capital Markets Studies, 53-71.
  3. Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict among shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 71-86.
  4. Behal, V., & Uppal, R. (2023). Factors impacting the corporate social responsibility of top firms listed in India. Indian Journal of Finance, 27-44.
  5. BEI. (2025, June 13). PT Bursa Efek Indonesia. Retrieved from Laporan Keuangan PT Bursa Efek Indonesia: https://www.idx.co.id/id
  6. Brenner, Sundaram, and Yermack. (2000). Altering the term of executive stock options. Journal of Financial Economics, 103-128.
  7. Brooks, L., & Cheng, A. (2024). Abnormal CSR Performance and Auditor-Litigation Risk. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 13-23.
  8. Cazkel, & Ozel. (2017). Earnings expectations and employee safety. Journal of Accounting and Economic, 121-141.
  9. Chariri, & Ghazali. (2007). Teori Akuntansi. Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP.
  10. Chen, Dong, & Lin. (2020). Institutional shareholders and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Financial Economics, 483-504.
  11. Christiawan, & Tarigan. (2007). Kepemilikan manajerial : kebijakan hutang, kinerja dan nilai perusahaan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 1-9.
  12. Deng, Kang, & Low. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers. Journal of Financial Economics, 87-109.
  13. Diebecker, & Sommer. (2019). Spoiled for choice: Does the selection of sustainability datasets matter? Working Paper, 1-10.
  14. Donovan O. (2022). Environmental disclosure in the annual report: extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory. Accounting and Accountability, 344-371.
  15. Eurosif. (2016). Eurosif response to the European Commission's public consultation on long-term and sustainable investment. London: Eurosif Report.
  16. Fahmi. (2012). Analisis Kinerja Kinerja Keuangan (Vol. III). Bandung: Alfabeta.
  17. Ferdinand, A. (2014). Metode Penelitian Manajemen : Pedoman Penelitian untuk Penulisan Skripsi Tesis dan Disertasi Ilmu Manajemen. Semarang: Diponegoro University Press.
  18. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 210-233.
  19. Ghozali, I. (2019). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  20. Gray. (1997). Manajemen Proyek. LPFE, 19-30.
  21. Isnanta. (2008). Pengaruh GCG dan Struktur Kepemilikan Terhadap Manajemen Laba dan Kinerja Keuangan. Yogyakarta: UII.
  22. Jensen, & Meckling. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 305-360.
  23. Jogiyanto. (2012). Teori Portofolio dan Analisis Investasi (Vol. III). Yogyakarta: BPFE.
  24. Kusumawati, R., Asyilah, N., & Bukhori, I. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility's Impact on Financial Performance: Moderating Effects of Earnings Management and Leverage. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis, 223-234.
  25. Laufer. (2003). Social accounting and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics, 253-261.
  26. Lopatta, Felix, and Sebastian. (2022). Abnormal CSR and Financial Performance. European Accounting Review, 1-27.
  27. Masulis, & Reza. (2014). Agency problems in corporate philanthropy. Review of Financial Studies, 592-636.
  28. Mulyadi. (2018). Auditing Buku (Vol. VI). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  29. Nguyen, Kecskes, & Mansi. (2020). Does corporate social responsibility create a shareholder value? The importance of long-term investors. Journal of Banking and Finance, 1-21.
  30. Patten. (1992). Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: a note on legitimacy theory. Accounting Organizations and Society, 471-475.
  31. Radmehr, M., & Arhinful, R. (2023). The Impact of Financial Leverage on the Financial Performance of Firms Listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. SAGE Open, 1-22.
  32. Rahmansyah, A., & Dhany, U. (2023). Kinerja Keuangan, Corporate Social Responsibility dan Peran Earnings per Share. Jurnal Akuntansi, 196-205.
  33. Rahmawati, Suparno, and Qomariyah. (2007). Pengaruh asimetri informasi terhadap praktik manajemen laba pada perusahaan perbankan publik yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia, 68-89.
  34. Rinaldy. (2011). Pengaruh CSR terhadap kepimilikan institusional pada perusahaan berkategori hig-profile yang listing di BEI. Jurnal Akuntansi, 20-40.
  35. Ross, Westerfield, & Jaffe. (202). Corporate Finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  36. Sayekti, & Wondabio. (2007). The Effect of CSR Disclosure on Earnings Response Coefficient. Seminar Akuntansi X, 26-38.
  37. Servaes, & Tamayo. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Science, 1045-1061.
  38. Sholihin, M. (2020). Data were analyzed using the STATA software. Yogyakarta: ANDI.
  39. Solihin. (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  40. Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitan Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  41. Syamsuddin. (2019). Manajemen Keuangan Perusahaan (Vol. III). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
  42. Utami. (2019). The influence of good corporate governance on corporate social responsibility disclosure. Profita : Komunikasi Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Perpajakan, 160-170.
  43. Wang, H., Tong, L., Takeuchi, R., & George, G. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility: An Overview and New Research Directions. Academy of Management Journal, 534-544.