Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of audit fees and auditor assessments on financial decision-making in banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the 2020–2024 period. The background of the study is based on the importance of reliable and timely financial information as a basis for decision-making by management and investors, especially in the banking sector which has strict regulations and high transaction complexity. The study uses an associative quantitative approach with secondary data from annual reports and independent auditor reports. The sample was determined using a purposive sampling method, with logistic regression analysis techniques. The results of the study indicate that audit fees do not significantly influence financial decision-making (H1 is rejected), while auditor assessment also does not significantly influence financial decision-making (H2 is rejected). Simultaneously, audit fees and auditor assessment do not show a significant influence on financial decision-making. This finding indicates that in the banking context at the IDX, variations in audit fees and auditor assessment indicators are not strong enough to influence financial decisions compared to other more dominant factors such as fundamental financial performance conditions and internal and external monitoring mechanisms. This study provides empirical contributions by enriching evidence regarding the role of audit fees and auditor assessments in financial decision-making in the banking sector in Indonesia and provides input for regulators, bank management, and the public accounting profession regarding the importance of ensuring that the added value of audits is substantively reflected in the reporting and decision-making process.

Keywords

Audit Fees Auditor Assessment Financial Decision Making Banking BEI

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Habibah, N., Eliza, A., & Putri, R. (2026). The Influence of Audit Fees and Auditor Assessment on Financial Decision Making in Banking Companies at the Indonesian Stock Exchange (2020-2024). Golden Ratio of Auditing Research, 6(2), 812–827. https://doi.org/10.52970/grar.v6i2.2260
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Arigawati, D. (2025). Strategi Penyusunan Laporan Keuangan yang Transparan dan Akurat untuk Meningkatkan Kepercayaan Investor. Jurnal Neraca Peradaban, 5(2), 74–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55182/jnp.v5i2.561
  2. Aulia, A. I., Fitriah, Y., & Astuti, R. P. (2025). Analisis Hubungan Kelembagaan Antara Bank Sentral, Pemerintah, Dan Perbankan Dalam Stabilitas Keuangan Indonesia. Menulis: Jurnal Penelitian Nusantara, 1(5), 325–333. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59435/menulis.v1i5.276
  3. Cahyadi, N. (2022). Pengaruh Audit Delay, Fee Audit, Audit Tenure dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Prosiding: Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 2(1), 691–698.
  4. Feriyanto, O., Kurniawan, A., & Hidayat, D. (2024). Peran Akuntansi Terhadap Pengambilan Keputusan Bisnis Melalui Analisis Big Data. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Manajemen Bisnis, 4(2), 32–41.
  5. Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 25. Universitas Diponegoro.
  6. Heryana, R. P., & Soeratin, H. Z. (2025). Pengaruh Audit Tenure Dan Audit Fee Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Akuntansi Keuangan Dan Perpajakan| E-ISSN: 3063-8208, 1(3), 302–308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62379/jakp.v1i3.240
  7. I, G. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  8. Indonesia, I. B. (2020). Pedoman dan Strategi Audit Intern Bank. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  9. Khamisah, N., Nurullah, A., & Kesuma, N. (2023). Pengaruh agresivitas penghindaran pajak, kompleksitas operasi perusahaan, audit fee, dan financial distress terhadap audit report lag. Reviu Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Indonesia, 7(1), 232–247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18196/rabin.v7i1.18005
  10. Maulana, Y., Maulana, D., & Maulana, J. (2024). Kualitas Audit: Fee Audit Dan Ukuran Kantor Akuntan Publik. Land Journal, 5(2), 411–422. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47491/landjournal.v5i2.3667
  11. Mayangsari, R. D., & Sazangka, A. Y. (2023). Pengaruh Ukuran Kantor Akuntan Publik, Audit Tenure dan Spesialisasi Kantor Akuntan Publik Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Owner: Riset Dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(3), 2598–2611. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i3.1455
  12. Muhammad Farhan, F. (2022). Pengaruh Auditor Switching, Audit Tenure, Ukuran Kap, Komite Audit Dan Audit Opinion Terhadap Audit Delay Pada Perusahaan Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2019–2021. Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau.
  13. Patricia, G., Suci, R. G., & Suriyanti, L. H. (2024). Pengaruh Audit Fee, Rotasi Audit, Audit Tenure dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Kualitas Audit pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2019-2022. EKOMA: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi, 3(6), 2008–2027. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56799/ekoma.v3i6.4691
  14. Purba, L. C. D., Sinaga, Y. M., & Gultom, S. A. (2022). Pengaruh Fee Audit, Ukuran Perusahaan (Firm Size) dan Ukuran Kantor Akuntan Publik terhadap Audit Delay. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan Dan Perpajakan, 5(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51510/jakp.v5i1.769
  15. Putri, W. A., & Kusumawati, E. (2025). Pengaruh Auditor Switching, Audit Tenure, Ukuran KAP, Solvabilitas, dan Opini Audit Terhadap Audit Report Lag. Paradoks: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 8(2), 1103–1114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.57178/paradoks.v8i2.1282
  16. Rahmawati, A. P., Setyowati, L., & Mardjono, E. S. (2026). Pengaruh Leverage , Ukuran Perusahaan , Komite Audit , Fee Audit dan Reputasi KAP terhadap Kualitas Audit. 5(2), 537–547. https://doi.org/10.54259/akua.v5i2.7452
  17. Reza, M. F., Kholik, R., & Kuntadi, C. (2024). PENGARUH KOMITE AUDIT , SPESIALISASI AUDITOR , DAN AUDIT TENURE TERHADAP KUALITAS AUDIT. 1(1), 11–25.
  18. Suryadi, H. (2021). Analisis Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Ketepatan Waktu Pelaporan Keuangan pada Perusahaan Consumer Goods Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2016-2018. Jurnal Riset Inspirasi Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 5(2), 27–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35130/jrimk.v5i2.246
  19. Suwarsa, T. (2026). Audit Tenure , Ukuran Kantor Akuntan Publik , dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern pada Perusahaan Publik di Indonesia. 4(02), 134–142. https://doi.org/10.58812/sak.v4.i02
  20. Tang, S., & Elvi, E. (2021). Analisis faktor-faktor yang berpengaruh terhadap ketepatan waktu pelaporan keuangan perusahaan. AKUNTABEL: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan, 18(1), 172–182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30872/jakt.v18i1.9403
  21. Utami, A. P., Vinalia, N., Febriyan, I., Putra, B. G., & Manurung, H. (2024). Peran Audit internal atas kualitas Pemeriksaan Laporan keuangan yang dilakukan oleh audit eksternal pada sebuah perusahaan. Jurnal Rimba: Riset Ilmu Manajemen Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 2(1), 54–63.
  22. Yulianingtias, K. S., & Triyuwono, I. (2024). Pengaruh Audit Tenure, Opini Auditor, dan Reputasi Kantor Akuntan Publik terhadap Audit Report Lag. Studi Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 7(2), 171–186.