Main Article Content

Abstract

The paper investigates the role of audit committee characteristics in a firm's financial performance. During the ongoing economic recession and the world financial crisis, the corporate governance systems are quite notorious. The audit committee represents one of the most important aspects of efficient corporate governance in companies. In Pakistan, little evidence exists on the effects of audit committees and their attributes on firm performance in the Pakistani literature. Four key characteristics of the audit committee were defined to examine their influence on the company's financial performance: independence, activity, size, and quality of the external audit. The researchers used Tobin's Q to quantify the market and ROA to quantify the accounting business. The panel data analysis showed that the size of the audit committee and the quality of the external audit positively and statistically significantly affect Return on Assets (ROA) and Tobin's Q. Two more variables, including audit committee independence and AC activity, also do not lead to any significant effect, and this can also be seen through the results of the jurisdiction studies that have been conducted in different countries. Essentially, the study has provided valuable information to regulators, policymakers, and stakeholders in Pakistan regarding the adoption of specific audit committee qualities. Incorporating these qualities can improve firms' financial performance. To determine whether the corporation's performance has improved, the audit committee's skills can be used to gather information at the company's administrative level.

Keywords

Activity Audit Committee External Audit Quality Independence ROA Size Tobin's Q

Article Details

How to Cite
Javed, M. N., Ahmad, A., Iqbal, A., & Waseem Qadri. (2026). Audit Quality and its Effect on the Financial Performance of the Firm: A Case Study of Pakistan . Golden Ratio of Auditing Research, 6(2), 636–646. https://doi.org/10.52970/grar.v6i2.1922

References

  1. Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2004). Audit Committee Characteristics and Restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(1), 69–87.
  2. Akbar, A., Zeb, S., & Zada, H. (2024). Impact Of Audit Committee Characteristics on Risk Disclosure: Evidence from The Banking Sector of Pakistan. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 1–16.
  3. Baxter, P., & Cotter, J. (2009). Audit Committees and Earnings Quality. Accounting & Finance, 49(2), 267–290.
  4. Be' Dard, J., Chtourou, S. M., & Courteau, L. (2004). The Effect of Audit Committee Expertise, Independence, And Activity on Aggressive Earnings Management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(2), 13-35.
  5. Beasley, M. S. (1996). An Empirical Analysis of The Relation Between the Board of Directors' Composition And Financial Statement Fraud. Accounting Review, 443–465.
  6. Becker, C. L., Defond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K. (1998). The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1–24.
  7. Bhagat, S., & Black, B. (2001). The Lack of Correlation Between Board Independence and Long-Term Performance. J. Corp. 1, 27, 231.
  8. Board, P. O. (1993). In Public Interest: A Special Report by the Public Oversight Board Of the SEC Practice Section, AICPA. Stamford, CT: POB.
  9. Bradbury, M., Mak, Y. T., & Tan, S. (2006). Board Characteristics, Audit Committee Characteristics, And Abnormal Accruals. Pacific Accounting Review, 18(2), 47–68.
  10. Brickley, J. A., Coles, J. L., & Terry, R. L. (1994). Outside Directors and The Adoption of Poison Pills. Journal Of Financial Economics, 35(3), 371–390.
  11. Brickley, J. A., & James, C. M. (1987). The Takeover Market, Corporate Board Composition, And Ownership Structure: The Case of Banking. The Journal Of Law and Economics, 30(1), 161–180.
  12. Chambers, A. D. (2005). Audit Committees: Practice, Rules, And Enforcement In the UK And China. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(1), 92–100.
  13. Chan, K. C., & Li, J. (2008). Audit Committee and Firm Value: Evidence on Outside Top Executives as Expert-Independent Directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(1).
  14. Committees, B. R. C. O. I. T. E. O. C. A. (1999). Report And Recommendations Of the Blue Ribbon Committee on Improving The Effectiveness Of Corporate Audit Committees. The Business Lawyer, 1067-1095.
  15. Davidson, R., Goodwin‐Stewart, J., & Kent, P. (2005). Internal Governance Structures and Earnings Management. Accounting & Finance, 45(2), 241–267.
  16. Felo, A. J., Krishnamurthy, S., & Solieri, S. A. (2003). Audit Committee Characteristics and The Perceived Quality Of Financial Reporting: An Empirical Analysis. Available At SSRN 401240.
  17. Foster, J. B., & Magdoff, F. (2009). The Great Financial Crisis: Causes and Consequences: NYU Press.
  18. Francis, J. R. (2004). What Do We Know About Audit Quality? The British Accounting Review, 36(4), 345–368.
  19. Francis, J. R., Maydew, E. L., & Sparks, H. C. (1999). The Role of Big 6 Auditors in The Credible Reporting of Accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 18(2), 17–34.
  20. Haron, H., Jantan, M., & Pheng, E. G. (2005). Audit Committee Compliance with Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Listing Requirements. International Journal of Auditing, 9(3), 187–200.
  21. Hill, C. (2004). Strategic Management: An Integrated Approach. Southwestern College Pub.
  22. Hossain, M., Cahan, S. F., & Adams, M. B. (2000). The Investment Opportunity Set and The Voluntary Use of Outside Directors: New Zealand Evidence. Accounting And Business Research, 30(4), 263–273.
  23. Humayun Kabir, M., Sharma, D., Islam, A., & Salat, A. (2011). Big 4 Auditor Affiliation and Accruals Quality in Bangladesh. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(2), 161–181.
  24. Javed, A., & Qazi, Y. I. (2024). Impact of Corporate Governance on Investment Efficiency Through Audit Quality in Pakistani Firms. Journal Of Business and Management Research, 3(1), 399–415.
  25. Jeong, S. W., & Rho, J. (2004). Big Six Auditors and Audit Quality: The Korean Evidence. The International Journal of Accounting, 39(2), 175–196.
  26. Kalbers, L. P., & Fogarty, T. J. (1993). Audit Committee Effectiveness: An Empirical Investigation of the Contribution of Power. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 12(1).
  27. Kamran, M. R., Shami, M. Z., Khan, A., & Hussain, M. M. (2023). Firm Performance: An Analysis of Financial Policy and Audit Quality in Pakistan. Journal Of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies, 9(4), 479–488.
  28. Krishnan, J. (2005). Audit Committee Quality and Internal Control: An Empirical Analysis. The Accounting Review, 80(2), 649–675.
  29. Lee, C. I., Rosenstein, S., Rangan, N., & Davidson III, W. N. (1992). Board Composition and Shareholder Wealth: The Case of Management Buyouts. Financial Management, 58–72.
  30. Lin, J. W., & Hwang, M. I. (2010). Audit Quality, Corporate Governance, And Earnings Management: A Meta‐Analysis. International Journal of Auditing, 14(1), 57–77.
  31. Lin, J. W., Li, J. F., & Yang, J. S. (2006). The Effect of Audit Committee Performance on Earnings Quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(9), 921–933.
  32. Mehran, M., Zubair, F., & Ahmed, W. (2022). Effect Of Audit Quality and CEO Remuneration on Firm Performance: A Study on Pakistan Stock Exchange-Listed Non-Financial Firms. International Journal of Business and Economic Affairs, 7(3), 59–77.
  33. Menon, K., & Williams, J. D. (1994). The Use of Audit Committees for Monitoring. Journal Of Accounting and Public Policy, 13(2), 121–139.
  34. Nawaz, M. H., Ahmad, A., Tahir, M., Saleem, F., Ullah, Z., Khan, M. N., & Raza, W. (2023). The Dynamics of Audit Committee Characteristics, External Audit Quality, And Firm Performance. Evidence From Firms Listed on The Pakistan Stock Exchange. Journal Of Positive School Psychology, 2374–2391.
  35. Palmrose, Z.-V. (1988). 1987 Competitive Manuscript Co-Winner: An Analysis of Auditor Litigation and Audit Service Quality. Accounting Review, 55–73.
  36. Pearce, J. A., & Zahra, S. A. (1992). Board Composition from A Strategic Contingency Perspective. Journal Of Management Studies, 29(4), 411–438.
  37. Pincus, K., Rusbarsky, M., & Wong, J. (1989). Voluntary Formation of Corporate Audit Committees Among NASDAQ Firms. Journal Of Accounting and Public Policy, 8(4), 239–265.
  38. Pucheta‐Martínez, M. C., & De Fuentes, C. (2007). The Impact of Audit Committee Characteristics on The Enhancement of The Quality of Financial Reporting: An Empirical Study in the Spanish Context. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(6), 1394–1412.
  39. Qin, B. (2007). The Influence of Audit Committee Financial Expertise on Earnings Quality: US Evidence. ICFAI Journal of Audit Practice, 4(3).
  40. Raghunandan, K., & Rama, D. V. (2007). Determinants Of Audit Committee Diligence. Accounting Horizons, 21(3), 265–279.
  41. Roziqin, A. (2025). In The Private and Public Sectors in Indonesia. Insights Into Digital Business, Human Resource Management, And Competitiveness, 377.
  42. Sommer Jr, A. (1991). Auditing Audit Committees: An Educational Opportunity for Auditors. Accounting Horizons, 5(2), 91.
  43. Williams, R. J., Fadil, P. A., & Armstrong, R. W. (2005). Top Management Team Tenure and Corporate Illegal Activity: The Moderating Influence of Board Size. Journal Of Managerial Issues, 479–493.
  44. Xie, B., Davidson III, W. N., & Dadalt, P. J. (2003). Earnings Management and Corporate Governance: The Role of the Board and the Audit Committee. Journal Of Corporate Finance, 9(3), 295–316.
  45. Yang, J. S., & Krishnan, J. (2005). Audit Committees and Quarterly Earnings Management. International Journal of Auditing, 9(3), 201–219.
  46. Yermack, D. (1996). Higher Market Valuation of Companies with A Small Board of Directors. Journal Of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185–211.
  47. Zahid, R. A., Khan, M. K., Anwar, W., & Maqsood, U. S. (2022). The Role of Audit Quality in the ESG-Corporate Financial Performance Nexus: Empirical Evidence from Western European Companies. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22, S200-S212.