Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines the influence of auditor switching, financial distress, and audit delay on audit quality in pharmaceutical manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the 2020–2023 period. The issue of audit quality gained heightened attention following the investigative findings of Indonesia’s Supreme Audit Board (BPK) on PT Indofarma Tbk, which revealed significant financial irregularities despite the issuance of clean audit opinions by the same public accounting firm. Using a quantitative approach and secondary data obtained from audited annual reports, the study analyzes 44 firm-year observations drawn from 11 companies that met the sampling criteria. Logistic regression is employed to evaluate whether the independent variables significantly influence the likelihood of receiving a high-quality audit, measured through Big Four affiliation. The findings show that auditor switching and audit delay do not significantly affect audit quality, indicating that changes in audit firms and variations in audit completion time do not determine the rigor of audit outcomes. Conversely, financial distress demonstrates a significant negative effect, suggesting that firms facing higher financial pressure receive lower audit quality, potentially due to increased risk perceptions and stricter auditor scrutiny. These results contribute to the literature by providing updated empirical evidence from a highly regulated and vulnerable industrial subsector. The study offers theoretical reinforcement for agency theory and practical insights for regulators, auditors, and corporate management regarding factors that may influence audit quality reliability.

Keywords

Audit Quality Auditor Switching Financial Distress Audit Delay Pharmaceutical Industry

Article Details

How to Cite
Suardi, R. P. H., Yusuf, M., & Daud, D. (2026). The Effect of Auditor Turnover, Financial Distress, and Audit Delays on Audit Quality in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (2020-2023). Golden Ratio of Auditing Research, 6(1), 532–543. https://doi.org/10.52970/grar.v6i1.1878

References

  1. Arifin, Agus Zainul. (2018). Manajemen Keuangan. Yogyakarta: Zahir Publishing. Budiantoro, H., Serena, A., & Tantriningsih, H. A. (2021). Pengaruh Audit Tenure,
  2. Ukuran KAP, Spesialisasi Auditor, dan Auditor Switching Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Journal Pf Research in Business, Economics, and Education, 3(5), 26–38. http://e-journal.stie-kusumanegara.ac.id
  3. Darmawan, M. S. (2021). Pengaruh Audit Fee, Audit Tenure, Dan Auditor Switching Pada Audit Report Lag Dengan Moderasi Spesialisasi Auditor Industri. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Riset Akuntansi, 10(5), 1–18.
  4. Dinillah, S., & Djamil, N. (2024). Pengaruh Audit Committee Andit Quality, Financial Stability Dan Financial Target Terhadap Financial Statement Fraud Pada Perusahaan Transportasi Yang Terdaftar Pada BEI Tahun 2021-2022. 2(1), 317-329.
  5. Ghozali, I.(2021). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 26 Edisi 10. Badan penerbit Universitas Dipenogoro.
  6. Handayani, P., & Setiwan, M. A. (2024). Pengaruh Auditor Switching, Komite Audit, dan Audit Capacity Stress Terhadap Kualitas Audit (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Sektor Finance yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2018-2020). Jurnal Akuntansi Inovatif. 2(1), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.59330/jai.v2i1.30
  7. Harianja, A., & Sinaga, J. T. G. (2022). The Effect of Audit Fee, Audit Delay, and Auditor Switching on Audit Quality. JASa (Jurnal Akuntansi, Audit Dan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi). https://doi.org/10.36555/jasa.v6i1.1709 6(1). 23-31.
  8. Mulyadi. (2017). Auditing. Buku 1 Edisi 6. Yogyakarta: Salemba Empat Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D,. Bandung, Alfabeta.
  9. Pamungkas, S. A., Purnamasari, D. I., & Windyastuti, W. (2022). Pengaruh Audit Tenure, Fee Audit, Komite Audit, Dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Kualitas Audit. CURRENT: Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Terkini, 3(2), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.31258/current.3.2.166-175
  10. Rahman, R. (2021). Pengaruh Financial Distress Dan Ukuran Kap Terhadap Kualitas Audit. JAK (Jurnal Akuntansi) Kajian Ilmiah Akuntansi, 8(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.30656/jak.v8i2.2351
  11. Rakha, A., & Sofia, I. P. (2022). Pengaruh Audit Delay, Auditor Switching dan Audit Tenure Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Konferensi Ilmiah Akuntansi IX 2022, 9(1), 1–15. https://ojs.uph.edu/index.php/KIA9/article/view/5628/pdf
  12. Rizal, M., & Yohanes Riky. (2023). Analisis Pengaruh Audit Tenure, Audit Delay, dan Auditor Switching Terhadap Kualitas Audit. STUDIA EKONOMIKA Journal of Accounting, 21, 89–80. https://jurnal-mnj.stiekasihbangsa.ac.id
  13. Sinaga, A. N., Sitorus, P. Z. E., & Haumahu, S. R. (2021). Pengaruh Audit Tenure, Ukuran Perusahaan, Audit Delay Dan Komite Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit Pada Perusahaan Trade, Service and Investment Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2017-2020. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 4(1), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.31004/jrpp.v4i1.1931
  14. Sugiyono, (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
  15. Syafanisa Lizara, F., & Subiyanto, B. (2022). Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Audit Tenure, Dan Financial Distress Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Eqien - Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 11(04), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.34308/eqien.v11i04.1277
  16. Yuliyani Yuliyani, & Kurnia Indah Sumunar. (2023). Pengaruh Green Corporate Governance, Umur Perusahaan, dan Financial Distress Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Akuntansi, 2(3), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.55606/akuntansi.v2i3.332