Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the role of state financial management in supporting the development and social reintegration of prisoners at Class IIA Parepare Correctional Facility, as well as to examine the effectiveness of the FARAH model (Financial Management, Accountability, Rehabilitation, Awareness, and Holistic Approach). This model is positioned as an integrative framework that links the technical aspects of budget management with social needs in Lapas. The research uses a qualitative method with a phenomenological approach based on Alfred Schutz's sociology. Data is obtained through in-depth interviews, observations, and document analysis, and its validity is tested through triangulation and member checking. Research results show that budget management in Parepare Correctional Facility has been carried out according to procedures, but still faces challenges such as overcapacity, limited resources, and partial rehabilitation programs. The implementation of the FARAH model (Financial Management, Accountability, Rehabilitation, Awareness, and Holistic Approach) offers an integrative solution: Financial management serves as the material basis that ensures basic needs and rehabilitation space are met, while Accountability builds transparency and trust as a form of state legitimacy. Rehabilitation opens up space for the transformation of values and behaviors, Awareness fosters moral and existential consciousness, and the Holistic approach unites all elements in a cross-sectoral collaboration network that strengthens social integration.

Keywords

State Financial Management Social Reintegration Accounting of Inmates FARAH Model

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Ramadhani, F. N., Yusuf, M., & Kanji, L. (2026). Reintegration of State Financial Management Through the FARAH Model: An Accounting Study of Inmates at Lapas Parepare. Golden Ratio of Auditing Research, 6(1), 490–503. https://doi.org/10.52970/grar.v6i1.1877
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Anthony, R. N., & Vijay Govindarajan. (2007). Management Control Systems (12th ed.). New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.
  2. Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan. (2023). Ikhtisar hasil pemeriksaan : semester II tahun 2023. Jakarta : Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan. https://library.bpk.go.id/koleksi/detil/jkpkbpkpp-p-CN7mO5WJ8n
  3. Bazemore, G., & Umbreit, M. S. (2014). Rethinking the Sanctioning Function in Juvenile Court : Retributive or Restorative Response to Youth Crime. 41(3), 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128795041003002
  4. Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. Free Press of Glencoe; Collier-Macmillan.
  5. Bisnis.Com. (2024). Sederet Masalah Anggaran Bansos Rp963,64 Miliar Sepanjang 2023, ASN jadi Penerima. https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20240609/9/1772492/sederet-masalah-anggaran-bansos-rp96364-miliar-sepanjang-2023-asn-jadi-penerima?
  6. Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
  7. Braithwaite, J. (2023). Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. Oxford University Press.
  8. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  10. Cullen, F. T., & Jonson, C. L. (2012). Correctional Theory: Context and Consequences. SAGE Publications.
  11. Direktorat Jenderal Pemasyarakatan. (2025). Jumlah Penghuni Lembaga Pemasyarakatan (Lapas), Rumah Tahanan Negara (Rutan), Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus Anak (LPKA), Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Perempuan (LPP). https://sdppublik.ditjenpas.go.id/
  12. Effendi, B. (2022). Perencanaan dan Pengelolaan Keuangan Warga Binaan LAPAS di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Melalui Penguatan Literasi Keuangan. PaKMas (Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat), 2(1), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.54259/pakmas.v2i1.825
  13. Freire, P. (1971). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Herder and Herder.
  14. Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance. Public Administration Review, 66(66–75). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x
  15. Geertz, C., & Darnton, R. (1973). The interpretation of cultures : selected essays. New York: Basic Books.
  16. Grindle, M. S. (1997). Getting good government : capacity building in the public sectors of developing countries. Harvard University Press.
  17. Halim, A. (2012). Akuntansi Sektor Publik: Akuntansi Keuangan Daerah (4th ed.). Salemba Empat: Jakarta.
  18. Hasanah, N., & Achmad Fauzi. (2017). Akuntansi pemerintahan. Bogor: In Media.
  19. Hasbiansyah, O. (2008). Pendekatan Fenomenologi: Pengantar Praktik Penelitian dalam Ilmu Sosial dan Komunikasi. MediaTor (Jurnal Komunikasi), 9(1), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.29313/mediator.v9i1.1146
  20. Honneth, A. (1995). The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. MIT Press.
  21. Horngren, C. T., Datar, S. M., & Madhav V Rajan. (2015). Cost Accounting 15th Edition : A Managerial Emphasis (15th ed.). Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
  22. Kemenkumham. (2022). Menkumham Yasonna Laoly: UU Pemasyarakatan untuk Perkuat Keadilan Restoratif. https://sumut.kemenkum.go.id/berita-utama/menkumham-yasonna-laoly-uu-pemasyarakatan-untuk-perkuat-keadilan-restoratif
  23. Kementerian Hukum dan HAM. (2023). Laporan Keuangan Tahun Anggaran 2023. https://kemenkum.go.id/informasi-publik/laporan/laporan-keuangan-tahunan/
  24. Kementerian Hukum dan HAM. (2024). Kemenkumham Realisasikan 97,16% Anggaran di Tahun 2023. https://jakarta.kemenkum.go.id/berita-utama/kemenkumham-realisasikan-97-16-anggaran-di-tahun-2023
  25. Liao, Y. (2016). Toward a Pragmatic Model of Public Responsiveness: Implications for Enhancing Public Administrators’ Responsiveness to Citizen Demands. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1256305
  26. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: SAGE Publications.
  27. Lipsky, M. (2010). Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services (30th Anniv). Russell Sage Foundation.
  28. Lusardi, A., & Olivia S. Mitchell. (2014). The Economic Importance of Financial Literacy: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.1.5
  29. Mahmudi, S.E., M.Si., CA., C. (2020). Manajemen Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah (U. S. Y. Yogyakarta (Ed.)).
  30. Mardiasmo. (2018). Akuntansi Sektor Publik: Edisi Terbaru. Yogyakarta: ANDI.
  31. Maryani, D. (2025). Pentingnya Pengelolaan Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Oleh Pihak Ketiga : Studi Perbandingan Negara Jerman. Jurnal Multidisiplin, 1(2), 115–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.70963/jm.v1i2
  32. Muladi, & Arief, B. N. (2010). Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana (4th ed.). Bandung: PT Alumni.
  33. Muslim. (2022). Pelaksanaan Sistem Pembinaan Narapidana pada Rumah Tahanan Negara Kelas II B Painan Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan. JIEE: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi, 2(2), 1–8.
  34. Nafukho, F. M., , & Nancy Hairston. (2004). Human capital theory: Implications for human resource development. Human Resource Development International, 7(4), 545–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/136788604
  35. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pembinaan Dan Pembimbingan Warga Binaan Pemasyarakatan, Pub. L. No. 31 (1999). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/54300
  36. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 71 Tahun 2010 Tentang Standar Akuntasi Pemerintahan. (2010). https://jdih.kemenkeu.go.id/dok/pp-71-tahun-2010/view
  37. Poluan, J. C., Antow, D. T., & Gerungan, L. K. F. R. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Reintegrasi Sosial Dalam Sistem Pemasyarakatan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 Tentang Pemasyarakatan (Vol. 14, Issue 2). Universitas Sam Ratulangi.
  38. Prasetyo, W. (2020). Panggung Drama Pendapatan Narapidana. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 11(2), 297–320. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.jamal.2020.11.2.18
  39. Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland; Or, Why It’s Amazing that Federal Programs Work at All, This Being a Saga of the Economic Development Administration as Told by Two Sympathetic Observers Who Seek to Build Morals (E. 3 (Ed.)). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  40. Prisonersabroad. (2017). Rehabilitation not recidivism : Norway’s success in keeping re-offending rates low. https://www.prisonersabroad.org.uk/news/rehabilitation-not-recidivism-norways-success-in-keeping-re-offending-rates-low
  41. Purnomo C. Suroso, Jantje J. Tinangon, H. W. (2022). Analisis Realisasi Belanja Di Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus Anak Kelas II Tomohon. Jurnal LPPM Bidang EkoSosBudKum (Ekonomi, Sosial, Budaya, Dan Hukum), 5(2), 1011–1018.
  42. Ramadhan, F., Sabir, M., Kairuddin, K., & Tijjang, B. (2025). Reintegrasi Sosial Narapidana : Analisis Yuridis Pasca Undang- Undang Pemasyarakatan. Jurnal Litigasi Amsir, 12, 109–115.
  43. Roberts, J. (2009). No one is perfect: The limits of transparency and an ethic for ‘intelligent’ accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(8), 957–970. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.005
  44. Sanusi, A. (2019). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Pembinaan Narapidana di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Terbuka. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 13(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2019.V13.123-138
  45. Sari, S. M. (2016). Pengaruh Perencanaan Anggaran, Kejelasan Sasaran Anggaran, dan Penerapan Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja Terhadap Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (Studi pada Direktorat Jenderal Pemasyarakatan Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI) [Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta]. https://repository.upnvj.ac.id/3244/
  46. Schutz, A. (1967). Phenomenology of the Social World. Northwestern University Press.
  47. Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Anchor.
  48. Shadd Maruna. (2001). Making Good: How Ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives. United States of America: American Psychological Association.
  49. Sulistiyo, H., & Dewanto, W. (2025). Kebijakan Hukum Dalam Upaya Mengatasi Kelebihan Kapasitas Narapidana di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan. IBLAM Law Review, 5(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v5i1.555
  50. Swanson, R. A. (2006). Human resource development: Performance is the key. Human Resource Development, 6(2), 207–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.3920060208
  51. Tinker, A. M. (1980). Towards a political economy of accounting: An empirical illustration of the Cambridge controversies. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(1), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(80)90031-8
  52. Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2003 Tentang Keuangan Negara, Pub. L. No. 17 (2003). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/43017/uu-no-17-tahun-2003
  53. Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 Tentang Pemasyarakatan, Pub. L. No. 22 (2022). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/218804/uu-no-22-tahun-2022
  54. Widayati, W. (2014). Pengelolaan Keuangan Negara (pp. 1–49). Universitas Terbuka.
  55. Wijaya, A. O., & Indrayenti. (2023). Analisis Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja dan Akuntabilitas Studi Kasus Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas I Bandar Lampun. Jambura Accounting Review, 4(2), 199–210.
  56. Yin, R. K. (2017). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  57. Zehr, H. (2014). The Little Book of Restorative Justice: Revised and Updated. Intercourse, PA : Good Books.