Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines the impact of e-wallet usage (EWU) on financial management (FM) among Generation Z in Indonesia, with a specific focus on the mediating role of financial literacy (FL). As digital natives, Gen Z exhibits high adaptability to financial technology (Fintech), particularly e-wallets, which offer convenience, speed, and integrated financial tools. However, the behavioral implications of e-wallet adoption—such as impulse buying and financial mismanagement—raise concerns about long-term financial well-being. Drawing on Financial Literacy Theory, the Behavioral Life-Cycle Hypothesis, and Self-Efficacy Theory, this research develops a conceptual framework linking e-wallet usage, financial literacy, and financial management. Using a quantitative approach, data were collected from 193 active Gen Z e-wallet users through a structured online survey. The study employed Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to test four hypotheses. Results reveal that e-wallet usage significantly enhances both financial literacy and financial management. Moreover, financial literacy strongly influences financial management and mediates the relationship between e-wallet usage and PFM. These findings suggest that while e-wallets facilitate financial activities, their effectiveness in improving financial outcomes depends on users' financial literacy. Theoretically, this study extends digital finance literature by highlighting financial literacy as a behavioral pathway that translates technological engagement into responsible financial behavior. Practically, it offers policy recommendations for educators, fintech providers, and government stakeholders to promote digital financial literacy and responsible e-wallet usage among Gen Z. By fostering financial acumen alongside technological fluency, this research contributes to sustainable financial inclusion and resilience in the digital economy.

Keywords

E-Wallet Usage Financial Literacy Personal Financial Management Generation Z Digital Finance Behavior

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Groda, S. P., & Kusbianto , N. (2025). The Impact of E-Wallet Usage on Personal Financial Management: A Case Study of Generation Z. Golden Ratio of Auditing Research, 6(1), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.52970/grar.v6i1.1744
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Baxi, C. O., Patel, K. J., Patel, K. M., Patel, V. B., & Acharya, V. A. (2023). Consumers' Digital Wallet Adoption: Integration of Technology Task Fit and UTAUT. International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJABIM.334016
  2. Belmonte, Z. J. A., Prasetyo, Y. T., Cahigas, M. M. L., Nadlifatin, R., & Gumasing, M. J. J. (2024). Factors influencing the intention to use e-wallet among Generation Z and millennials in the Philippines: An extended technology acceptance model (TAM) approach. Acta Psychologica, 250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104526
  3. Chhillar, N., Sharma, K., & Arora, S. (2025). Exploring the role of digital financial literacy and personal financial behavior in shaping financial stress and well-being in the digital age. Acta Psychologica, 259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105308
  4. F. Hair, J. F., Jr., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
  5. Herzallah, F., Abosamaha, A. J., Abu-Siam, Y., Amer, M., Sajjad, U., & Hamid, K. (2025). Determinants of mobile wallet usage among Gen Z: Extending the UTAUT2 model with moderating effects of personal innovativeness and gender. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2025.100336
  6. Kelly, A. E. (2024). Both hedonic and utilitarian values influence the sustainability and contribution of Generation Z in their use of mobile money services for fee payment. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2024.100145
  7. Li, Q., & Zhang, X. (2024). Digital Finance Development in China: A Scientometric Review. In Heliyon (Vol. 10, Issue 16). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36107
  8. Marhadi, M., Fathoni, A. F., Setiawan, B., Pratiwi, D., Hayati, R., Boros, A., & Sudibyo, N. A. (2024). Continuance intention of Fintech Peer-to-Peer (P2P) financing Shariah: Moderation role of brand schematicity and digital financial literacy. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100301
  9. Nyrhinen, J., Sirola, A., Koskelainen, T., Munnukka, J., & Wilska, T. A. (2024). Online Antecedents of Young Consumers' Impulse Buying Behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108129
  10. Pinchot, J. L., Mishra, S., Paullet, K. L., & Kohun, F. G. (2016). Exploring Barriers To Adoption Of Mobile Payments For University Students: Lack Of Awareness, Lack Of Availability, And Perceived Security Risks. Issues In Information Systems, 17(3), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.48009/3_iis_2016_20-30
  11. Rosli, M. S., Saleh, N. S., Md. Ali, A., & Abu Bakar, S. (2023). Factors Determining the Acceptance of E-Wallet among Gen Z from the Lens of the Extended Technology Acceptance Model. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075752
  12. Sadok, H., & Elouaourti, Z. (2025). The cash vs. digital Paradox: Why financial literacy matters in uncertain times. Borsa Istanbul Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2025.08.001
  13. Sconti, A., Caserta, M., & Ferrante, L. (2024). Gen Z and financial education: Evidence from a randomized control trial in the South of Italy. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2024.102256
  14. Setiawan, M., Effendi, N., Santoso, T., Dewi, V. I., & Sapulette, M. S. (2022). Digital financial literacy, current behavior of saving and spending, and its future foresight. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 31(4), 320–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2020.1799142
  15. Shefrin, H. M., & Thaler, R. H. (1988). The Behavioral Life‐Cycle Hypothesis. Economic Inquiry, 26(4), 609–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1988.tb01520.x
  16. Song, X., Qin, X., Wang, W., & Man Li, R. Y. (2025). Financial inclusion, technologies, and worldwide economic development: A spatial Durbin model approach. Journal of Finance and Data Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfds.2025.100155
  17. Tohar, G., & Akron, S. (2025). Financial Literacy Cognitions and Optimal Financial Behavior. Finance Research Letters, 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107455
  18. Wang, K.-H. (2025). Beyond digital finance: The impact of internet banking adoption on subjective life satisfaction. Finance Research Open, 1(2), 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finr.2025.100012
  19. Windasari, N. A., Kusumawati, N., Larasati, N., & Amelia, R. P. (2022). Digital-only banking experience: Insights from Gen Y and Gen Z. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100170
  20. Wu, X. Q., Yap, C. S., & Ho, P. L. (2022). Use of Digital Finance Platforms for Personal Finance Management in Rural China: Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/JECO.296256