Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to empirically investigate the effect of time constraints, audit fees, and auditor motivation on audit quality, either alone or concurrently. The census sampling approach was used to select a sample of 50 independent auditors who work at the Representative Office of the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency (BPKP) in South Sulawesi Province. The data collection instrument was a questionnaire submitted directly to the auditor by the researcher. Multiple regression analysis with the SPSS program was employed as the analytical method in this investigation. Primary and secondary data sources are used in the research. Primary data were gathered through a questionnaire administered by the researcher to the respondents. Secondary data was gleaned from documents pertinent to the subject of the study. This technique was used since there are multiple independent variables. According to the findings of this study, time constraints and auditor motivation have a favorable and significant effect on audit quality. In comparison, audit fees have a significant detrimental impact on audit quality. The findings of this study serve as a guide and motivator for BPKP Auditors as they conduct audits of all government agencies, ensuring that the final reports are of the highest quality. Additionally, researchers can use the findings of this study to contribute insight and serve as a source of reference and information for future research.

Keywords

Audit Quality Time Pressure Audit Fees Auditor Motivation

Article Details

How to Cite
Ishak, P., & Shalehah, N. L. H. (2022). The Impact of Time Pressure, Audit Fees and Auditor Motivation on Audit Quality. Golden Ratio of Auditing Research, 2(1), 1–11. Retrieved from https://goldenratio.id/index.php/grar/article/view/165

References

  1. Agoes, S. (2012). Praktikum audit. (kedua). Penerbit Salemba.
  2. Amaliyah, F. (2015). Pengaruh Tekanan Waktu, Materialitas Dan Tindakan Supervisi Terhadap Penghentian Prematur Atas Prosedur Audit (Studi Empiris Pada Kantor BPKP Perwakilan Yogyakarta). (Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta). Retrieved from http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/37469
  3. Angelo De, LE. 1981. Auditor Independence, “Low Balling”, and Disclosure Regulation. Juornal of Accounting and Economics 3 August p. 113-127
  4. Ardini, L. (2010). Pengaruh kompetensi, independensi, akuntabilitas dan motivasi terhadap kualitas audit. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Airlangga, 20(3).
  5. Arens, Alvin A., Randal J. Elder, Mark S. Beasley, and A. A. J. (2011). Auditing and Assurance Services. Pearson Education Limitid, England.
  6. Arens, Alvin A., Randal J. Elder, Mark S. Beasley, and A. A. J. (2012). Auditing and Assurance Service: An Intergrated Approach an Indonesian Adaption, Jurong.
  7. Hanjani, A. (2014). Pengaruh Etika Auditor, Pengalaman Auditor, Fee Audit, Dan Motivasi Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit (Studi pada Auditor KAP di Semarang). Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 3(2), 111–119. Retrieved from http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting
  8. Hartati, N. L. (2012). Pengaruh Karakteristik Internal Dan Eksternal Auditor Terhadap Penerimaan Perilaku Disfungsional Atas Prosedur Audit. Accounting Analysis Journal, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v1i2.654
  9. Hery. (2010). Potret Profesi Audit Internal (Diperusahaan Swasta & BUMN Terkemuka). Bandung: Alfabeta.
  10. IFAC, International Standard on Audit, 2010, http://www.ifac.org.id
  11. Ningsih, A. . P. R. C., & S. Yaniartha, P. D. (2013). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi , dan Time Budget Pressure Terhadap Kualitas Audit. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 4(1), 92–109.
  12. Pratama, I. M. I., & Ketut, N. (2015). Pengaruh Time Budget Pressure, Risiko Kesalahan Audit , Dan Masa Perikatan Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Daerah Bali. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 11.1, 211–219.
  13. Primastuti, F. D., & Suryandari, D. (2014). Pengaruh Time Budget Pressure Terhadap Kualitas Audit Dengan Independensi Sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi Kasus Pada Bpk Ri Perwakilan Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta). Accounting Analysis Journal, 3(4), 446–456. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v3i4.4206
  14. Ratha, I., & Ramantha, I. (2015). Pengaruh Due Professional Care, Akuntabilitas, Kompleksitas Audit, dan Time Budget Pressure Terhadap Kualitas Audit. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 13(1), 311–339.
  15. Rikarbo, R. Y. (2012). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penghentian Prematur Prosedur Audit. Jurusan Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Riau.
  16. Sari, R. (2013). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi dan Motivasi terhadap Kualitas Audit Pada Inspektorat. Universitas Jambi.
  17. Setiawan, L., & Fitriany, F. (2011). Pengaruh Workload Dan Spesialisasi Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit Dengan Kualitas Komite Audit Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 8(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2011.03
  18. Setyorini, A. I. (2011). Pengaruh Kompleksitas Audit, Tekanan Anggran Waktu, Dan Pengalaman Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit Dengan Variabel Moderating Pemahaman Terhadap Sistem Informasi.
  19. Shintya, A., Nuryatno, M., & Oktaviani, A. A. (2016). Pengaruh Kompetensi, independensi, dan Tekanan Anggaran Waktu Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Seminar Nasional Cendekiawan 2016, 1–19. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.25105/semnas.v0i0.873
  20. Simanjuntak, A., & Siahaan, S. B. (2019). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi, Integritas dan Profesionalisme Auditor terhadap Kualitas Audit Dengan Etika Auditor Sebagai Variabel Moderasi (Studi Kasus Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Kota Medan). Jurnal Manajemen, 5(1), 81–92. Retrieved from http://ejournal.lmiimedan.net
  21. singgih Elisha, M., and R. B. I. (2010). Pengaruh Independensi, due profesional care, dan akuntabilitas terhadap kualitas audit. Simposium Nasional XIII.
  22. Tuanakotta, T. M. (2014). Audit Berbasi ISA (International Standards on Auditing). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.